2024:HHC:9380
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
SHIMLA
CWP No. 9881 of 2024
Decided on : 30.09.2024
Mohit
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another.
…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate
General and Mr. Pushpinder
Jaswal, Additional Advocate
General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned
Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the
respondents.
.
2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has filed representation Annexure P-3 with regard to
the issues raised in the petition, but the same has not been
decided by the Authority concerned till date.
1
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2024:HHC:9380
3. This petition, accordingly, as prayed for, is disposed
of with the direction that let representation Annexure P-3 of the
petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of
the averments made therein, by passing a speaking order,
within a period of six weeks’ from today, in accordance with law.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand
disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
September 30, 2024
(Shivank Thakur)
Digitally signed by
AVNISH KANT TIWARI
Date: 2024.10.01
18:26:22 IST