IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.4131 of 2021 and
connected matters.
Decided on: 29th October, 2024
_________________________________________________________________
1. CWP No. 4131 of 2021
Narender Pal and others ....Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
2. CWP No. 4005 of 2021
Sanjay Sharma and others ....Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
3. CWP No. 4121 of 2021
Hardeep Kaur and others ....Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
4. CWP No. 4809 of 2021
Jeet Kumar and others ....Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
5. CWP No. 5374 of 2021
Manorma Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
- 2 -
6. CWP No. 5442 of 2021
Bhagi Rath ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
7. CWP No. 5443 of 2021
Manju Bala ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
8. CWP No.5505 of 2021
Manjusha ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
9. CWP No. 5508 of 2021
Vijay Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
10. CWP No. 5544 of 2021
Surender Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
11. CWP No. 5636 of 2021
Lalita Sharma ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
- 3 -
12. CWP No. 5694 of 2021
Sunita Kumari Sharma ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
13. CWP No. 5698 of 2021
Sudarshan Gautam ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
14. CWP No. 5862 of 2021
Kusam Kumari ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
15. CWP No. 5879 of 2021
Shashi Anand ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
16. CWP No. 6139 of 2021
Reena Banga ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
17. CWP No. 6142 of 2021
Saroj Thakur ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
- 4 -
18. CWP No. 6153 of 2021
Kusum Lata ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
19. CWP No. 6859 of 2021
Poonam ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
20. CWP No. 6861 of 2021
Chander Kiran ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
21. CWP No. 6900 of 2021
Panna Lal ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
22. CWP No. 7323 of 2021
Murari Lal Sharma and others ....Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
23. CWP No. 1254 of 2022
Ranjeet Singh ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
- 5 -
24. CWP No. 1258 of 2022
Sanjay Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
25. CWP No. 1262 of 2022
Virender Thakur ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
26. CWP No. 1264 of 2022
Sunil Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
27. CWP No. 1268 of 2022
Rakesh Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
28. CWP No. 1270 of 2022
Kamal Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
29. CWP No. 1273 of 2022
Murli Chand ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
- 6 -
30. CWP No. 1274 of 2022
Navneet Thakur ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
31. CWP No. 1276 of 2022
Shashi Bala ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
32. CWP No. 1421 of 2022
Jeewna Sharma ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
33. CWP No. 1422 of 2022
Ghanshyam Thakur ...Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
34. CWP No. 1423 of 2022
Rakesh Gupta ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
35. CWP No. 1429 of 2022
Arvind Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
- 7 -
36. CWP No. 1430 of 2022
Ajay Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
37. CWP No. 1431 of 2022
Vikas ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
38. CWP No. 1432 of 2022
Minu Sharma ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
39. CWP No. 1433 of 2022
Sulochna Sharma ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
40. CWP No. 11127 of 2024
Klip Singh and others ....Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
41. CWP No. 5617 of 2021
Ravi Kant ....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P.& Ors. …Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
- 8 -
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting?
_________________________________________________________________
For the petitioners: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate
General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Heard.
2. These writ petitions have been filed for grant of
following common substantive relief: -
“(i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may
kindly be issued directing the Respondents to
count the services rendered by the Petitioners on
contract basis prior to their regularization as
qualifying service for the purpose of pension
under CCS Pension Rules, 1972 and for the
purpose of annual increments, in the interest of
justice.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the issue raised in these writ petitions has already been
adjudicated in Budhi Singh & Ors Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CWP No. 10911 of 2024, decided on 21.10.2024.
4. Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
- 9 -
ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India without even preferring any
representation(s) to the competent authority for the redressal
of their grievances raised in these writ petitions.
5. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the
petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring
representation(s) within three weeks from today. In case such
a representation(s) is/are so made, the same shall be decided
by the competent authority in accordance with law within a
period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also
be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above
terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if
any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
October 29, 2024
R.Atal