Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Himachal Pradesh/
  4. 2024/
  5. November

Padma Dorje vs. State of Hp and Others

Decided on 30 November 2024• Citation: CRMMO/1082/2024• High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA                  
                                                   Cr. MMO No.1082/2024.            
                                                       th                           
                                        Date of Decision: 30 November 2024.         
                    Padma Durje                            .....Petitioner.         
                                        Versus                                      
                    State of Himachal Pradesh & others                              
                                                        …..Respondents              
                    Coram                                                           
                    The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.              
                    Whether approved for reporting?                                 
                                     1                                              
                     For the Petitioner : Mr. Sative Chauhan and Mr. Satpal Chauhan,
                                       Advocates.                                   
                     For the Respondents : Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma Additional Advocate
                                       General, for respondent No.1.                
                                    :  Mr. Prashant Chauhan, Advocate, for          
                                       respondent No.2.                             
                    Bipin Chander Negi, Judge                                       
                                         (oral).                                    
                          By way of instant petition filed under Section 528 of the 
                  Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, a prayer has been made on behalf
                  of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.168 of 2024 dated 21.09.2024,
                  under Sections 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 196
                  M.V. Act, registered at Police Station Solan Sadar (Saproon) District Solan
                  H.P.; as well as consequent judicial proceedings arising out of the same.
                  2.     The averments contained in the petition, which are duly    
                  supported by  an  affidavit reveal that on 21.09.2024,            
                  complainant/respondent No.3 had got a FIR registered against the  
                  petitioner, under 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the BNS, 2023 and Section
                  196 M.V. Act. However, during the pendency of proceedings, the dispute
                  inter se parties has been settled amicably vide compromise dated  
               1                                                                    
                    Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

                                          2                                         
                  17.10.2024, which is appended alongwith the present petition      
                  as Exhibit P-1.                                                   
                  3.     Statement of complainant/respondent No.3 stands recorded. He
                  has categorically stated that he has entered into compromise of her own
                  free will, volition and without any pressure. According to the    
                  complainant/respondent No.3, the dispute inter se parties stands  
                  amicably settled.                                                 
                  4.     I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
                  record carefully.                                                 
                  5.     This Court sees no impediment in quashing the FIR in issue, as
                  the dispute inter se parties stands amicably resolved.            
                  6.     From a perusal of Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik     
                  Suraksha Sanhita, it is evident that the offence under Sections 281 of the
                  BNS and 196 of M.V. Act are non-compoundable.                     
                  7.     In this respect, attention of this Court has been drawn to a case
                  titled Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another  
                  reported as (2014) 6 Supreme Court Cases, 466, wherein the Apex   
                  Court has categorically laid down that the High Court has inherent power
                  to quash the criminal proceedings even in those cases, which are not
                  compoundable, where the parties have amicably settled the matter inter
                  se them. However, this power is to be exercised sparingly and with
                  caution, in cases where settlement is arrived at. The guiding factors
                  being securing the ends of justice or to prevent an abuse of the process
                  of any Court.                                                     

                                          3                                         
                  8.     In view of the fact that the parties have entered into     
                  compromise permitting the proceedings in pursuance to the aforesaid FIR
                  sought to be quashed to continue would only result into an abuse of
                  process and the same would not secure the ends of justice.        
                  9.     Accordingly, the petition is allowed. FIR No.168 of 2024 dated
                  21.09.2024, under Sections 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the BNS, 2023
                  and Section 196 M.V. Act, registered at Police Station Solan Sadar
                  (Saproon) District Solan H.P; is quashed and consequent judicial  
                  proceedings arising out of the same are also quashed.             
                  10.    The petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the
                  pending application(s), if any.                                   
                                                 (Bipin Chander Negi)               
                                                      Judge                         
                     th                                                             
                   30 November, 2024 (tarun)