IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MMO No.1082/2024.
th
Date of Decision: 30 November 2024.
Padma Durje .....Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others
…..Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
1
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sative Chauhan and Mr. Satpal Chauhan,
Advocates.
For the Respondents : Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma Additional Advocate
General, for respondent No.1.
: Mr. Prashant Chauhan, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.
Bipin Chander Negi, Judge
(oral).
By way of instant petition filed under Section 528 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, a prayer has been made on behalf
of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.168 of 2024 dated 21.09.2024,
under Sections 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 196
M.V. Act, registered at Police Station Solan Sadar (Saproon) District Solan
H.P.; as well as consequent judicial proceedings arising out of the same.
2. The averments contained in the petition, which are duly
supported by an affidavit reveal that on 21.09.2024,
complainant/respondent No.3 had got a FIR registered against the
petitioner, under 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the BNS, 2023 and Section
196 M.V. Act. However, during the pendency of proceedings, the dispute
inter se parties has been settled amicably vide compromise dated
1
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
17.10.2024, which is appended alongwith the present petition
as Exhibit P-1.
3. Statement of complainant/respondent No.3 stands recorded. He
has categorically stated that he has entered into compromise of her own
free will, volition and without any pressure. According to the
complainant/respondent No.3, the dispute inter se parties stands
amicably settled.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record carefully.
5. This Court sees no impediment in quashing the FIR in issue, as
the dispute inter se parties stands amicably resolved.
6. From a perusal of Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita, it is evident that the offence under Sections 281 of the
BNS and 196 of M.V. Act are non-compoundable.
7. In this respect, attention of this Court has been drawn to a case
titled Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another
reported as (2014) 6 Supreme Court Cases, 466, wherein the Apex
Court has categorically laid down that the High Court has inherent power
to quash the criminal proceedings even in those cases, which are not
compoundable, where the parties have amicably settled the matter inter
se them. However, this power is to be exercised sparingly and with
caution, in cases where settlement is arrived at. The guiding factors
being securing the ends of justice or to prevent an abuse of the process
of any Court.
3
8. In view of the fact that the parties have entered into
compromise permitting the proceedings in pursuance to the aforesaid FIR
sought to be quashed to continue would only result into an abuse of
process and the same would not secure the ends of justice.
9. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. FIR No.168 of 2024 dated
21.09.2024, under Sections 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the BNS, 2023
and Section 196 M.V. Act, registered at Police Station Solan Sadar
(Saproon) District Solan H.P; is quashed and consequent judicial
proceedings arising out of the same are also quashed.
10. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the
pending application(s), if any.
(Bipin Chander Negi)
Judge
th
30 November, 2024 (tarun)