IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No :6604 of 2020
Decided on : 30th November, 2024
__________________________________________________________
Radha Devi ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & ors. ….Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge
1 Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Chauhan, Advocate
vice Mr. M.C. Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
For the respondents : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi,
Additional Advocate General,
for respondents No.1 & 2-
State.
Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent
No.3.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
On 29.11.2024, Learned Counsel for
petitioner submitted that since the petitioner was
willing to work in Kullu and in such eventuality, prayer
was made to direct to explore the possibility of
considering her case for employment somewhere in
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
- 2 -
District Kullu.
2. Today, Mr. Anil Chauhan, Learned Vice
Counsel, appearing for the petitioner states that since
the petitioner has now shifted from Kullu to
Chandigarh, therefore, she is not willing to work at
Kullu and is also not interested to continue further
with present proceedings. Statement is taken on
record.
3. Learned Respondents’ Counsel also do not
oppose the prayer, being innocuous.
4. In aforesaid terms, the instant petition is
dismissed, due to subsequent development. Ordered
accordingly.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any,
shall also stand disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge
November 30, 2024
(Shivender)