IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 4949/2024
Decided on:31.05.2024
Sarita Kumari & Anr. …Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
………………………………………………………………………………
Coram
Ms. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents. : Mr. R.S. Verma and Mr. Y.P.S.
Dhaulta, Additional Advocates
General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
Notice. Mr. R.S. Verma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents.
2. The record of the case shows that the petitioners have
directly moved this Court without representing to the
respondent/competent authority.
3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of
by granting liberty to the petitioners to represent to the
respondent/competent authority for the redressal of their grievances
raised in the writ petition. It is hoped and expected and learned
Additional Advocate General assures that as soon as the
1
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
representation is preferred, the same shall be decided by the
competent authority in accordance with law expeditiously &
preferably within three months from the receipt thereof.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also
stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
May 31, 2024
(rohit)