Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Himachal Pradesh/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Roshan Lal and Anr vs. Nhai and Ors

Decided on 31 May 2024• Citation: ARB.C/565/2024• High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                       IN THE HIGH COURT  OF HIMACHAL  PRADESH  AT SHIMLA           
                                              Arb.Case No.565 of 2024               
                                              Decided on: 31st May, 2024.           
                     _________________________________________________________________
                     Roshan Lal & Anr    .                     ....Petitioners      
                                         Versus                                     
                      NHAI & Ors.                            …Respondents           
                     _________________________________________________________________
                     Coram                                                          
                     Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua,                                 
                     1 Whether approved for reporting?                              
                     _________________________________________________________________
                     For the petitioners:   Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate.               
                     For the respondents:   Ms. Shreya Chauhan,  Advocate, for      
                                            respondent No.1.                        
                                            Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Central Govt.      
                                            Counsel, for respondent No.2.           
                                            Mr. R. S. Verma and   Mr. Y. P. S.      
                                            Dhaulta,   Additional   Advocates       
                                            General, for respondents No.3 and 4.    
                     Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge                                       
                               It is not in dispute that a Reference Petition       
                     bearing No.243/2018   preferred by the petitioner under        
                     Section 3G   of the  National Highways  Act is  pending        
                     adjudication before the learned Arbitrator, i.e. the Divisional
                     Commissioner, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. The period of 12       
                     1  Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes

                                               - 2 -                                
                     months  in terms  of Section 29A(1) of the Arbitration &       
                     Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short ‘the Act’), available to the  
                     learned Arbitrator for passing the award stands elapsed. The   
                     period specified under Section 29A(3) of the Act is also over, 
                     hence, the learned Arbitrator has closed the proceedings in    
                     view of termination of his mandate. In these circumstances,    
                     the  petitioner has prayed  for extending the  time for        
                     pronouncing the award by six months.                           
                     3.        I have heard learned counsel on both sides and       
                     considered the case file. It has been informed that in similar 
                     matters, taking recourse to Section 29A(4) of the Act, the     
                     Courts have extended the period for passing the award by six   
                     months.                                                        
                     4.        The petitioner has made out a case for extending     
                     the period for deciding the arbitration proceedings by six     
                     months.  Ordered  accordingly. The mandate   of learned        
                     Arbitrator in deciding the petition under reference is extended
                     by six months from today. The parties, through their learned   
                     counsel, are directed to appear before the learned Arbitrator  
                     on 12.06.2024. All rights and contentions of the parties are   
                     left open to be adjudicated by the learned Arbitrator.         

                                               - 3 -                                
                               The  petition stands disposed of in the above        
                     terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if    
                     any.                                                           
                                                         Jyotsna Rewal Dua          
                                                                Judge               
                     May  31, 2024                                                  
                        R.Atal