IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
SHIMLA
CWP No. 8453 of 2023
th
Decided on 28 March, 2024
Anamika
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another
…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
1
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. P.K. Verma, Advocate, vice Mr.
K.B. Khajuria, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General,
with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal,
Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate, for
respondent No.4.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
After making his submissions for some time,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
may be permitted to withdraw the petition, but with liberty to
make a representation to the Authority concerned for his
adjustment at some convenient station.
2
2. The petition is permitted to be withdrawn, with
liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous applications, if
any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
March 28, 2024
(Vinod)