2024:HHC:4182
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 5965 of 2024
Decided on: 28.06.2024
Vikas Garg & others … Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & another … Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
____________________________________________________ _
For the petitioners : Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General,
with Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy
Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Mr. Sumit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General,
accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment passed by
Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2004 of 2017 alongwith
connected matters, titled as Taj Mohammad and Ors. Vs. State of
H.P. and Ors., decided on 03.08.2023. He further submits that
petitioners shall be content in case the respondents are directed to
consider the case of the petitioners in a time bound manner in light
of judgment ibid.
3. Prayer being innocuous is allowed and also not opposed.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of by directing the
respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioners in
1
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
light of the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP
No. 2004 of 2017 alongwith connected matters, within eight weeks
from today by passing a detailed and reasoned order. In case, the
petitioners are found similarly situated as petitioners in CWP
No. 2004 of 2017, he will also be granted the same benefits as
granted to the petitioners in above referred case.
5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also
stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
June 28, 2024
(Rishi)