Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Himachal Pradesh/
  4. 2024/
  5. July

Durga Dass vs. State of Hp and Others

Decided on 31 July 2024• Citation: CWP/6346/2024• High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                  ( 2024:HHC:6128 )                               
                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL  PRADESH,             
                                          SHIMLA                                  
                                                  CWP  No. 6346/2024              
                                                  Decided on: 31.07.2024          
                    Durga Dass                             …Petitioner            
                                        Versus                                    
                    State of H.P. & Ors.                     ....Respondents.     
                    ………………………………………………………………………………                                
                    Coram                                                         
                    Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.                         
                    Whether approved for reporting?1                              
                    For the petitioner :     Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with   
                                             Mr. Arun Rana, Advocate.             
                    For the respondents :    Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional      
                                             Advocate General, for respondent     
                                             No.1.                                
                   Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J                                          
                               Notice confined to respondent No.1, which is waived
                    by Mr. Amandeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General.  
                              In view of the nature of order being passed hereinafter,
                    notice of this petition is not required to be issued to respondents
                    No.2 to 4.                                                    
                    2.        With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the
                    matter is heard at this stage.                                
                    3.        The petitioner applied for demarcation of the land  
                    comprised in Khasra No. 448, measuring 0-4-8 bighas situated at
                    1                                                             
                     Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes

                                          ( 2024:HHC:6128 )                       
                    Mohal Khiuri Dom 285, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi. The demarcation
                    was carried out on 07.02.2020. Assistant Collector First Grade,
                    Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, vide his order dated 19.04.2021 declined
                    to accept the demarcation report on the ground that the owners of
                    the land adjoining to Khasra No. 448 had not been associated in the
                    demarcation. Petitioner’s appeal against the aforesaid order passed
                    by the Assistant Collector First Grade was dismissed by the   
                    Collector on 21.11.2022. Revision petition preferred by the   
                    petitioner under Section 17 of Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act
                    was also dismissed by the Financial Commissioner (Appeals) on 
                    the same ground, vide order dated 07.11.2023.                 
                              Assailing the orders passed by the Assistant Collector
                    First Grade on 19.04.2021, by the Collector on 21.11.2022 and by
                    the Financial Commissioner on 07.11.2023, the petitioner has  
                    preferred this writ petition.                                 
                    4.        Learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner fairly   
                    submitted that in terms of notification dated 16.07.2012, amending
                    Para-10.2 of Chapter 10 of the H.P. Land Records Manual, the  
                    applicant seeking demarcation, is required to implead all persons,
                    who are co-sharers with him in the land of which demarcation is
                    being sought. Besides, those who are in possession of adjoining
                    plots of land, are also required to be impleaded as necessary 
                    parties to the demarcation. Learned Senior Advocate further   

                                          ( 2024:HHC:6128 )                       
                    submitted that in view of the amendment of para-10.2 of Chapter 10
                    of the H.P. Land  Records Manual  vide notification dated     
                    16.07.2012, the impugned orders passed against the petitioner 
                    cannot be said to be suffering from any infirmity. However, learned
                    Senior Advocate also submitted that the petitioner is ready & willing
                    and be permitted to move an application for fresh demarcation, in
                    accordance with law, after impleading the adjoining land      
                    owners/persons, who are in possession of adjoining plots of land,
                    and whereafter direction be issued to the competent authority to
                    demarcate the land, in accordance with law, within a reasonable
                    period.                                                       
                              Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection
                    to the aforesaid submissions.                                 
                    5.        Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has
                    been non-suited by the authorities on the ground that the adjoining
                    landowners/persons in possession of adjoining plots of land had not
                    been impleaded during the demarcation, also keeping in view the
                    submissions made by learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner
                    that the petitioner is ready & willing to apply for fresh demarcation,
                    in accordance with law, as per the amended provisions of Para-10.2
                    of Chapter-10 of the H.P. Land Records Manual and keeping in  
                    view the submission of learned Additional Advocate General, it is
                    deemed appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the

                                          ( 2024:HHC:6128 )                       
                    petitioner to move an application for demarcation of the subject
                    land, in accordance with law. In case, such application is moved
                    before the competent authority, the same shall be decided and 
                    demarcation shall be carried out, in accordance with law, as  
                    expeditiously as possible & preferably within four months. Learned
                    Additional Advocate General is directed to bring this order to the
                    notice of Assistant Collector First Grade Tehsil Balh, District
                    Mandi/competent authority/authorized authority.               
                              With the above direction, the instant petition is   
                    disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also
                    stand disposed of.                                            
                                                          Jyotsna Rewal Dua       
                                                             Judge                
                   July 31, 2024                                                  
                      (rohit)