Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Himachal Pradesh/
  4. 2024/
  5. January

Rahul Kumar vs. Hpsebl and Ors

Decided on 24 January 2024• Citation: CWP/807/2024• High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA                   
                                       CWP No.807/2024.                           
                                                       th                         
                                       Date of Decision: 24 January, 2024.        
                 Rahul Kumar                          .....Petitioner.            
                                      Versus                                      
                 Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. & others.          
                                                     …..Respondents.              
                 Coram                                                            
                 The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Vacation Judge.      
                 Whether approved for reporting?                                  
                                    1                                             
                  For the Petitioner: Mr. C.S. Thakur, Advocate.                  
                  For the Respondents: Ms. Shashi Kiran Negi, Advocate vice       
                                      Mr.  Ravinder Thakur, Advocate, for         
                                      respondents No.1 and 2.                     
                                      None for respondent No.3.                   
                      Bipin Chander Negi, Vacation Judge                          
                                                    (oral).                       
                       Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw
                the instant petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law. The
                prayer being innocuous is allowed.                                
               2.     Accordingly, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with
                liberty, as prayed.                                               
                       All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
                                             (Bipin Chander Negi)                 
                                                Vacation Judge                    
                  th                                                              
                24  January, 2024                                                 
                 (CS)                                                             
            1     Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.