IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petit. No. 110 of 2024
Decided on: 29.02.2024
Bhimender .…Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior
Advocate with Mr. Rajneesh K. Lall,
Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer for
respondents No. 1 and 3.
Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate for
respondent No. 2.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Law Officer and
Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate, accept notice on behalf of respondents
No.1 and 3 and respondent No.2, respectively.
2. By way of this execution petition, the petitioner is
seeking implementation of the judgment passed in CWPOA No.20
of 2019, decided on 19.03.2021, as modified by Hon’ble Division
Bench of this Court in CWP No.3894 of 2021 alongwith connected
matters, decided on 31.12.2021, as subsequently modified by
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in the judgment passed in Civil
1
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Appeal No.7602 of 2023, titled as Ankita Thakur & Ors. vs. The
H.P. Staff Selection Commission & Ors. decided on 09.11.2023.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also
learned Advocate General and learned counsel for respondent
No.2, as now the State Government is bound to implement the
directions passed by this Court, as affirmed by Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India in Para-45 of its judgment, therefore, this execution
petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to implement
the same within a period of twelve weeks. In case, needful is not
done, then the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for
revival of these proceedings. Pending miscellaneous applications, if
any stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
February 29, 2024 Judge
(narender)