Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Himachal Pradesh/
  4. 2024/
  5. December

Manohar Lal vs. the State of Hp and Others

Decided on 31 December 2024• Citation: CWP/16706/2024• High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                     IN THE HIGH  COURT  OF HIMACHAL   PRADESH,   SHIMLA          
                                                      CWP No.16706 of 2024        
                                                 Date of decision: 31.12.2024     
                    Manohar Lal.                               ...Petitioner.     
                                            Versus                                
                    State of H.P. & Ors.                    ...Respondents.       
                    Coram:                                                        
                    Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.                         
                    Whether approved for reporting?                               
                    For the petitioner :     Mr. R.K. Parmar, Advocate.           
                    For the respondents :    Ms.  Leena   Guleria, Deputy         
                                             Advocate General.                    
                    Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge                                      
                              Notice. Ms. Leena  Guleria, Deputy  Advocate        
                    General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of    
                    the respondents.                                              
                    2.        The petitioner served as a Head Constable in the    
                    respondent-Police  Department.    He    submitted    a        
                    representation in June   2019  for premature/voluntary        
                    retirement due to bad health and adverse domestic/family      
                    circumstances. Respondents   accepted  the  petitioner’s      
                    representation, and  he  was  allowed  to  proceed  on        
                    premature/voluntary retirement with effect from 31.08.2019,   
                    vide office order dated 20.06.2019.                           
                    1                                                             
                      Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

                                                -2-                               
                    3.        Three years later, on 12.09.2022, the petitioner    
                    moved    another   application to   respondent   No.4,        
                    Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, praying for his re-       
                    enlistment/rejoining. Respondent No.4 considered the fact     
                    that  the petitioner’s request for premature/voluntary        
                    retirement had  been  accepted vide office order dated        
                    20.06.2019. Respondent No.4 also considered the provisions    
                    contained in Punjab Police Rules, more particularly, Rule     
                    12.24(1) for re-enlistment in service, which reads as under:- 
                                12.24 Enlistment of ex-soldiers, reservists and ex-police
                                officers. (1) Re-enrolment in the rank of constable is
                                permitted and past service will count for pension under
                                the following conditions, and subject to the further
                                conditions as to pensions contained in rules 9.2 and
                                9.29:-                                            
                                (a) Ex-soldiers of the Indian Army and ex-members of
                                    police forces (including Military Police), paid for from
                                    the general revenues of India, may be enlisted as
                                    constables on production of a discharge certificate
                                    showing their previous service to have fulfill the
                                    physical and other standards required by these
                                    rules for first appointments. They must also be
                                    passed medically fit by the same standards as are
                                    applied to recruits.                          
                                (b) Age of the date of enrolment in the police must be
                                    below 30, but ex Punjab police officers, and, with
                                    the special sanction of the Inspector General in each
                                    case, ex-soldiers and ex-members of other police
                                    forces may be re-enlisted up to the age of 55, if they
                                    present themselves for re-enrolment and are found
                                    medically fit within two years of their discharge.
                                (c) The break in service between the date of discharge
                                    and between 1st days of the month in which    
                                    enrolment process is started shall not exceed four
                                    years.                                        

                                                -3-                               
                                (d) No claim to count previous service for pension shall
                                    be allowed unless the previous service claimed was
                                    declared and verified at the time of enrolment in the
                                    police.                                       
                                (e) Service in a body of additional police shall be
                                    counted for increments in the case of a constable
                                    transferred to the regular force immediately on such
                                    transfer.”                                    
                    4.        As per the applicable Punjab Police Rules, re-      
                    enlistment could  only be  made   within two  years of        
                    premature/voluntary retirement, and the  petitioner had       
                    proceeded   on   premature/voluntary   retirement   on        
                    31.08.2019, he  had  already completed three years  by        
                    31.08.2022.  Therefore, his request  for re-enlistment/       
                    rejoining services, made on 12.09.2022, was rejected vide     
                    office order dated 18.11.2022 being beyond the prescribed     
                    time limit. The petitioner’s appeal against this order was    
                    dismissed by the Inspector General of Police, Central Police  
                    Range, Mandi (respondent No.3), on 12.07.2023.                
                              The above  facts are not in dispute. It is an       
                    admitted position that the petitioner was permitted to retire 
                    voluntarily/prematurely vide office order dated 20.06.2019,   
                    with effect from 31.08.2019, at his  own  request. The        
                    petitioner has also not disputed that, under the applicable   
                    Rule 12.24(1) of the Punjab Police Rules pertaining to re-    

                                                -4-                               
                    enlistment in service, he had already crossed the time limit  
                    for making such a request. Hence, no interference with the    
                    impugned  order is called for. The writ petition fails and to 
                    stand dismissed.                                              
                              Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall 
                    also to stand disposed of.                                    
                                                      Jyotsna Rewal Dua           
                    31th December, 2024                     Judge                 
                         (     )                                                  
                          Pardeep