Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Himachal Pradesh/
  4. 2024/
  5. August

Anuja Rathore Sharma vs. State of Hp and Others

Decided on 30 August 2024• Citation: CWP/9080/2023• High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA                  
                                        CWP No.9080/2023.                           
                                                      th                            
                                        Date of Decision: 30 August, 2024.          
                    Anuja Rathore Sharma              .....Petitioner.              
                                       Versus                                       
                    State of HP & Ors.                …..Respondents.               
                    Coram                                                           
                    The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.              
                    Whether approved for reporting?                                 
                                       1                                            
                     For the Petitioner: Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate.             
                     For the Respondents: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. Advocate    
                                       General, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.        
                                       Mr. Sanjeev Sood and Mr. Het Ram Thakur,     
                                       Advocates, for respondent No.3.              
                        Bipin Chander Negi, Judge                                   
                                                 (oral).                            
                         Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the        
                  present petition by afflux of time has become infructuous.        
                  2.     Accordingly, present petition is disposed of being         
                  infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any.          
                                                (Bipin Chander Negi)                
                                                     Judge                          
                     th                                                             
                   30  August, 2024                                                 
                   (Gaurav Rawat)                                                   
               1    Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES