Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Himachal Pradesh/
  4. 2024/
  5. August

Atul Kumar vs. State of Hp and Others

Decided on 30 August 2024• Citation: CRMMO/596/2024• High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                                   2024:HHC:7564    
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA                 
                                       Cr.MMO No. 596 of 2024                       
                                       Reserved on: 13.08.2024                      
                                       Date of Decision: 30.08. 2024.               
               Atul Kumar                                                           
                                                                ....Petitioner      
                                              Versus                                
               State of H.P. & Ors.                                                 
                                                             ....Respondents        
               Coram                                                                
               Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.                          
               Whether approved for reporting? No                                   
               For the petitioner     :  Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr.        
                                         Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate.              
               For respondents        :  Ms.  Ayushi Negi, Deputy Advocate          
                                         General  for respondents No.1 to           
                                         3/State.                                   
                                      :                                             
                                         Ms. Abhilasha Kaundal, Advocate for        
                                         respondents No.4 and 5.                    
               Rakesh Kainthla,Judge                                                
                         The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of   
               Cr.P.C. for quashing of F.I.R. No. 102 of 2023, dated 09.06.2023, for the
               commission of offences punishable under Sections 279 and 337 of IPC  
               registered at Police Station Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. and consequent
               proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R based on compromise effected
               between the parties.                                                 
               _______________                                                      
               Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

                                            2                                       
                                                                   2024:HHC:7564    
               2.        It has been asserted that the matter has been compromised  
               between the parties voluntarily and in view of the compromise, the FIR
               be quashed.                                                          
               3.        The statement of informant and injured were recorded on    
               11.07.2024 in which they have stated that the matter had been        
               compromised between the parties voluntarily without any influence    
               from any person and they have no objection, in case the FIR lodged   
               against the petitioner/accused is ordered to be quashed.             
               4.        I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone 
               through the records carefully.                                       
               5.        This Court had already quashed the F.I.R. registered for the
               commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of 
               IPC in Sushant vs State of H.P. 2023 HLC 531, Vikas Huda vs. State of H.P.
               2023 STPL 3009, Kulwidner Singh vs Ankush Kumar 2023 HLR 384 and     
               Nishant vs. State 2022 Suppl. Law Cases 45 and others based on the   
               compromise. These judgments are binding on this Court.               
               6         Therefore, in view of these precedents, the present petition
               is allowed and F.I.R. No. 102 of 2023, dated 09.06.2023, for the     
               commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, and 337 of IPC 
               registered at Police Station at Dehra, District kangra, H.P. is ordered to

                                            3                                       
                                                                   2024:HHC:7564    
               be quashed. Consequent upon the quashing of FIR, criminal proceedings
               pending/initiated against the petitioner-accused in pursuance thereto,
               are also ordered to be quashed.                                      
               7.        Petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also    
               pending applications, if any.                                        
               8.        Parties are permitted to produce a copy of this judgment,  
               downloaded from the webpage of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh    
               before the authorities concerned, and the said authorities shall not insist
               on the production of a certified copy but if required, may verify passing
               of the order from Website of the High Court.                         
                                                     (Rakesh Kainthla)              
                                                         Judge                      
                30th August, 2024                                                   
                    (ravinder)