IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT
SHIMLA
CWP No. 3519 of 2024
th
Decided on 30 April, 2024
Rakesh Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
1
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. C.S. Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General,
with Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur,
Additional Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Issue notice. Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, learned
Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the
respondents.
2. With the consent of the parties, the petition is being
disposed of today itself with the direction that the
representation that has been filed by the petitioner, be decided
by the Competent Authority, within a period of six weeks from
today, but it is clarified that this court has not made any
2
observation with regard to the merit of the prayer made therein
and the Competent Authority shall be at liberty to decide the
representation of the petitioner as per Rules.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
April 30, 2024
(Vinod)