Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Gujarat/
  4. 2024/
  5. March

Renukaben Jayeshkumar Patel vs. Jayeshkumar Shantilal Patel

Decided on 28 March 2024• Citation: SCA/3293/2014• High Court of Gujarat
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                   C/SCA/3293/2014                    ORDER DATED: 28/03/2024     
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD                  
                        R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3293 of 2014              
               ==========================================================         
                             RENUKABEN  JAYESHKUMAR  PATEL                        
                                         Versus                                   
                              JAYESHKUMAR  SHANTILAL PATEL                        
               ==========================================================         
               Appearance:                                                        
               MR MA KHARADI(1032) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1                    
               MR YM THAKKAR(902) for the Respondent(s) No. 1                     
               ==========================================================         
                CORAM:HONOURABLE     MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP  N. BHATT                
                                     Date : 28/03/2024                            
                                      ORAL ORDER                                  
                         Learned  advocate  Mr.A.A.Ghasura   for  learned         
               advocate Mr.Kharadi  for the  petitioner, upon instructions,       
               submits that by passage of time, the prayers prayed for in         
               this petition have become infructuous and therefore he does        
               not press this petition.                                           
                         In view of the above, this petition is disposed of       
               as not pressed. Notice/Rule, if any, stands discharged. Interim    
               relief, if any, stands vacated.                                    
                                                      (SANDEEP N. BHATT,J)        
               SRILATHA                                                           
                                        Page 1 of 1