Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Gujarat/
  4. 2024/
  5. February

Rajubhai @ Rajendrabhai Parsottambhai Jotangiya vs. State of Gujarat

Decided on 29 February 2024• Citation: CR.MA/11090/2021• High Court of Gujarat
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                  R/CR.MA/16604/2021                   ORDER DATED: 29/02/2024    
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD                  
                  R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE           
                               FIR/ORDER) NO. 16604 of 2021                       
                                          With                                    
                       R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 12235 of 2021              
                                          With                                    
                       R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 12205 of 2021              
                                          With                                    
                       R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 11090 of 2021              
                                          With                                    
                       R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 12538 of 2021              
                                          With                                    
                       R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 14311 of 2021              
               ==========================================================         
                    HEMALBHAI @ HEMANTBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI  JOTANGIYA               
                                         Versus                                   
                                STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.                           
               ==========================================================         
               Appearance:                                                        
               for the Applicant(s) No. 1                                         
               MS RIDDHI R GONDALIYA(13954) for the Applicant(s) No. 1            
               M S PADALIYA(7406) for the Respondent(s) No. 2                     
               MS JYOTI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1                    
               ==========================================================         
                CORAM:HONOURABLE     MR. JUSTICE CHEEKATI                         
                       MANAVENDRANATH     ROY                                     
                                     Date : 29/02/2024                            
                                      ORAL ORDER                                  
               1.   This batch of petitions under Section 482 of the Criminal     
               Procedure Code are filed for quash of common FIR registered        
               against the  applicants being C.R.No.I-11213006210302  of          
               2021 registered with Bhayavadar Police Station, Rajkot Rural,      
               for the offences punishable under Section 498-A, 354-A, 323,       
               504, 506 (2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.                     
                                        Page 1 of 3                               

                  R/CR.MA/16604/2021                   ORDER DATED: 29/02/2024    
               2.   As all the applicants are accused in the above crime and      
               as  they are  seeking  quash  of the  common   FIR, these          
               applications are heard together and they are being disposed of     
               by this common order.                                              
               3.   When  the are came  up  for hearing, both the learned         
               counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the second     
               respondent-defacto complainant submit that the parties have        
               entered into compromise and they have amicably settled the         
               dispute between them and that the marriage between accused         
               no.1 and the defacto complainant was  dissolved by way of          
               decree of divorce passed by the competent Court of law and         
               that they have  decided to compound   the above  offences.         
               Learned   counsel  for   the  second   respondent-defacto          
               complainant  has  also filed the affidavit of the defacto          
               complainant in all these applications, wherein she has stated      
               that she has already obtained a decree of divorce by mutual        
               consent from the Family Court, Ahmedabad, against accused          
               no.1 in Family Suit No.663 of 2023 on 14.8.2023 and that in        
               view of  said settlement of dispute between  her and  the          
               accused that she has no objection for quash of the aforesaid       
               FIR registered against the applicants on her report.               
               4.   The defacto complainant is also physically present before     
               the Court today. When questioned, she unequivocally stated         
               that in view of the decree of divorce that was obtained by her     
               by mutual consent against her husband, who is accused no.1,        
               and as the disputes are now amicably settled between them          
               that she has no objection to quash the FIR that was registered     
               against the applicants on her report. She has also stated that     
                                        Page 2 of 3                               

                  R/CR.MA/16604/2021                   ORDER DATED: 29/02/2024    
               she has  voluntarily, out of her free will and volition, has       
               entered into said compromise and there is no compulsion on         
               her in arriving at the settlement.                                 
               5.   Although the aforesaid offences are non-compoundable          
               offences, as per the dictum laid down by a three Judge Bench       
               of the Apex  Court in the case Gian  Singh  Vs. State  of          
               Punjab  &  Another,  reported in (2012)  10  SCC  303,  in         
               appropriate cases, this Court in exercise of its inherent powers   
               under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, permit the       
               parties to compound the offence even in non-compoundable           
               offences, when there is no impact on the society. Even though      
               some   cases  are enlisted in  the  said judgment   where          
               permission to compound the same cannot be granted, present         
               case is not falling within the said exempted cases. So, the        
               petitioners and the  defacto complainant  are entitled for         
               permission to compound aforesaid offences.                         
               6.   Therefore, permission  to  compound    the  aforesaid         
               offences is accorded, as  sought  for. The compromise   is         
               recorded.                                                          
               7.   Resultantly, all these applications are allowed and the       
               aforesaid FIR  being   C.R.No.I-11213006210302   of  2021          
               registered with Bhayavadar   Police Station, Rajkot Rural,         
               against the petitioners is hereby quashed, in view of the          
               compromise.                                                        
                                        (CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH  ROY, J)         
               R.S. MALEK                                                         
                                        Page 3 of 3