Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Gujarat/
  4. 2024/
  5. April

Shah Jignesh Pankajbhai vs. State of Gujarat

Decided on 29 April 2024• Citation: SCR.A/1312/2015• High Court of Gujarat
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                  R/SCR.A/1312/2015                    ORDER DATED: 29/04/2024    
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD                  
                 R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 1312 of 2015       
               ==========================================================         
                                SHAH JIGNESH PANKAJBHAI                           
                                         Versus                                   
                                STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.                           
               ==========================================================         
               Appearance:                                                        
               MR CHETAN B RAVAL(2090) for the Applicant(s) No. 1                 
               MR ANKUR Y OZA(2821) for the Respondent(s) No. 3                   
               NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2                    
               MR. L.B. DABHI, LD. ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)  
               No. 1                                                              
               ==========================================================         
                CORAM:HONOURABLE     MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI                 
                                     Date : 29/04/2024                            
                                      ORAL ORDER                                  
                    The matter has been called out twice, however, learned        
               advocate  appearing  for the applicant has  not  remained          
               present. Thus, it seems that the learned advocate appearing        
               for the applicant is not interested in proceeding further with     
               the matter. Hence, the present application is dismissed for        
               want of prosecution. Notice/Rule, if any, is discharged. Interim   
               relief, if any, also stands vacated.                               
                                                       (DIVYESH A. JOSHI,J)       
               VAHID                                                              
                                        Page 1 of 1