$~S5 & S6
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 1336/1998
AJAY NARAIN
.....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate.
Versus
AARTI SINGH & ORS.
.....Defendant
Through: Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Advocate for
D-1.
Mr. Bharat Arora, Advocate for D-2.
S6
+ CS(OS) 2273/2000
AARTI SINGH
.....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Advocate for
P-1.
Mr. Bharat Arora, Advocate for P-2.
Versus
AJAY NARAIN
.....Defendant
Through: Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 18.12.2024
1. The matter has been put up on Office Note, wherein it is mentioned
that the Agreement to Sell Ex.D-13 as mentioned in paragraph 173 is in fact
dated 30.03.1998 though it has been written as 31.03.1998.
2. Record perused.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2024 at 12:48:53
3. There has been a typographical error. The same is rectified and the
Agreement to Sell Ex.D-13 be read as dated 30.03.1998.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
DECEMBER 18, 2024
va
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2024 at 12:48:53