$~1(Original Side)
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(COMM) 1231/2016
BINDRA TRAVEL LINE PVT. LTD. .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Shashank Garg and Ms. Nishta
Jain, Advocates
versus
SEHWAG INTERNAIONAL SCHOOL .....Defendant
Through: Mr. Counsel through VC(appearance
no given)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 03.09.2024
I.A. 38242/2024 (delay of 14 days in filing)
1. In view of the reasons stated in the Application, the same is allowed.
2. The delay is hereby condoned.
REVIEW PET. 322/2024
3. The present Review Petition has been filed under Order XLVII Rule 1
of the CPC, 1908 read with Section 114 of the CPC for review of the
Judgement dated 28.06.2024.
4. It is submitted that while recovery of Rs. 20,42, 724/- towards the
Bills for the month of April and May, 2015, the interest @9% has been
allowed only for those two months and no interest has been awarded
pendente lite and future till the date of payment.
5. The Order is absolutely clear and there is no error on the face of
record which required modification.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:14:52
6. The second aspect which has been challenged is in respect of the
claim of Rs.10,23,980/- towards deductions. It is claimed that the findings
on this aspect are contrary to the evidence of the documents filed on behalf
of the parties.
7. However, the challenge does not fall within the scope of Review.the
parties are at liberty to seek the appropriate remedy.
8. There is no ground for review and the petition is hereby disposed of.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 3, 2024/PT
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:14:52