Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Delhi/
  4. 2024/
  5. February

Saurabh Sharma vs. Presidio Security Group Llp

Decided on 29 February 2024• Citation: CRL.M.C./1696/2024• High Court of Delhi
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                 $~54                                                             
                 *    IN THE   HIGH  COURT   OF DELHI  AT  NEW   DELHI            
                 +    CRL.M.C. 1696/2024 & CRL.M.A. 6523/2024 (Stay)              
                      SAURABH   SHARMA                        ..... Petitioner    
                                     Through:  Mr. Sumit Nandvani, Advocate       
                                               (through VC).                      
                                     versus                                       
                      PRESIDIO  SECURITY GROUP  LLP           ..... Respondent    
                                     Through:  None.                              
                      CORAM:                                                      
                      HON'BLE   MR. JUSTICE AMIT  SHARMA                          
                                     O R D E R                                    
                 %                   29.02.2024                                   
                 CRL.M.A.  6522/2024 (Exemption)                                  
                 1.   Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.              
                 2.   The application is accordingly disposed of.                 
                 CRL.M.C.  1696/2024 & CRL.M.A. 6523/2024 (Stay)                  
                 3.   The  present petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeks the
                 following prayers:                                               
                      “i. Quash the Complaint Case CC NI ACT/6389/2022 for the    
                      offence w/s 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 titled as M/s
                      Presidio Security Group                                     
                                         LLP vs M/s Aarav International”, pending 
                      in the court of Ms Norma Jain, Ld. MM, South, Saket Courts, New
                      Delhi U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188lalong with all
                      the proceedings emanating there from.                       
                      ii. Pass any other order or directions that                 
                                                      this Hon‟ble Court may      
                      deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in
                      favor of the petitioner.”                                   
                 4.   Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the latter entered into a
   This is a digitally signed order.                                              
   The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
   The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/03/2024 at 11:17:10          

                 service agreement with the respondent. Thereafter, the petitioner continued
                 to make payments for services rendered pursuant to the said agreement. It is
                 submitted that various payments have been made totalling to Rs. 15,10,662/-
                 till 26.04.2022. It is submitted that thereafter, the respondent filled in the
                 particulars of a blank cheque given by the petitioner with a sum of Rs.
                 21,71,832/- and deposited the same with the bank. The said cheque
                 dishonored on 25.07.2022 and the subject complaint was filed. The
                 impugned summoning  order was passed on 22.10.2022, whereby the  
                 petitioner was summoned to face trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable
                 Instruments Act, 1881.                                           
                 5.   It is submitted that the subject cheque was issued only for the purpose
                 of security and the debt owed had already been paid to the respondent. It is
                 submitted that the cheque in question was not paid towards a legally
                 enforceable debt and therefore, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted under
                 Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.                   
                 6.   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.
                 7.   The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the CrPC,
                 invoking inherent powers of this Court, seeking to set aside the impugned
                 summoning order and quash the subject complaint instituted on behalf of the
                 respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.  
                 8.   It is settled law that the scope of enquiry in exercise of jurisdiction
                 under Section 482 of the CrPC is limited. This inherent jurisdiction must be
                 exercised sparingly and with great circumspection. It is pertinent to note that
                 the issues raised by the petitioner are disputed questions of fact and at this
                 stage, where parties have not led any evidence, this Court cannot embark
                 upon a detailed examination of the same. The said disputed questions of fact
   This is a digitally signed order.                                              
   The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
   The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/03/2024 at 11:17:10          

                 are before the learned Trial Court, to be adjudicated upon by the said Court
                 after the parties have led evidence in support of their case.    
                 9.   In view of the above, this Court is of the considered opinion that no
                 grounds for allowing the prayers in the present petition are made out.
                 10.  The petition is dismissed and disposed of accordingly.      
                 11.  Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.       
                 12.  Needless to state, nothing stated hereinabove is an opinion on the
                 merits of the case.                                              
                                                             AMIT SHARMA,   J     
                 FEBRUARY    29, 2024/bsr                                         
   This is a digitally signed order.                                              
   The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
   The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/03/2024 at 11:17:10