1 / 2
2024:CGHC:42420
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5420 of 2024
1 - Dr. M.K. Dwivedi S/o Dr. I.K. Dwivedi, Aged About 68 Years R/o 1/a, Street-V, Sector-9,
Bhilai, District-Durg (C.G.)
... Petitioners
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And
Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2 - The Collector, District-Durg (C.G.)
3 - The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District-Durg (C.G.)
... Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. Faiz Kazi, Advocate
For State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. A.G.
For Respondent No.3 : Ms. Shrijita Kesharwani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rajesh
Kesharwani, Advocate
{(Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput})
Order on Board
25.10.2024
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present writ
2 / 2
petition may be disposed of permitting the petitioner to make a detailed
representation to respondent/competent authority for the grievances projected
in the writ petition, respondent/competent authority may be directed to
consider and decide the same within the reasonable period of time in
accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he is having no
objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner.
4. Be that as it may, after considering the submissions made by the both the
parties at bar and on perusal of the documents available on record, this petition
is disposed of, at this stage, permitting the petitioner to make a detailed
representation before the respondent No.2/competent authority projecting all
his grievances as projected in this writ petition along with the copy of petition
within 30 days from today and in turn respondent No.2/competent authority is
expected to consider and decide the same within the period of 120 days from
submission of such representation in accordance with the relevant rules and
law applicable to the case of petitioner.
5. If any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, he may avail the remedy
available under the law.
6. This Court does not express anything on the merits of this case.
7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and
directions.
Certified Copy as per rules.
Sd/-
({Sachin Singh Rajput})
JUDGE
Abhigya.S