NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CR No. 18 of 2020
Smt. Jahida Begum W/o Late Mehtab Khan, Aged About 82
Years, Occupation House Wife, R/o Jhanda Chowk, Pandari,
Raipur, Tahsil and District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
1. Abdul Rafique Khan S/o Abdul Jabbar Khan, R/o Tatyapara,
Mominpara, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Abdul Hafiz Khan, S/o Late Mehtab Khan;
3. Nayaz Ahmad S/o Late Mehtab Khan, Aged About 46 Years;
Respondents No.2 & 3 are R/o Jhanda Chowk Pandri, District
Raipur Chhattisgarh.
4. Smt. Shamshad Begum D/o Late Mehtab Khan, R/o Talapara,
Tayyaba Chowk, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
5. Smt. Shahnaz Begum D/o Late Mehtab Khan, R/o
Dallirajhara, District - Balod Chhattisgarh.
6. Atika Raza S/o Late Abdul Kareen;
7. Smt. Deelnawaz Bano D/o Late Abdul Kareem Khan;
8. Smt. Kadir Bano W/o Late Abdul Kareem Khan;
Respondents No.6 to 8 are Residental Of Dhobi Gali
Baijnathpara, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.
9. Abdul Latif S/o Late Abdul Jabbar Khan;
10. Abdul Raheem S/o Late Abdul Jabbar Khan;
11. Smt. Badrunnisha Begum W/o Late Shamsher Khan;
Respondents No.9 to 11 are Residental Of House
No.30/110, Infornt Of Libas Tailors Gali, Tatyapara, Raipur,
District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
12. Abdul Shakeel Khan S/o Abdul Hakeem Khan, Aged About
35 Years;
13. Arshiya Khan D/o Abdul Hakeem, Aged About 30 Years,
14. Abdul Shoheb Khan S/o Abdul Hakeem Khan, Aged About 28
Years,
15. Smt. Shakeela Khan W/o Abdul Hakeem Khan;
Respondents No.12 to 15 are Resident Of Mominpara, Raipur,
District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For Applicant :- None.
For Respondents :- Mr. B.L. Sahu, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
28/03/2024
1. The intant civil revision is listed on default, since orders of this
Court dated 11.08.2023 & 19.02.2024 respectively, have not
been complied with as pointed out by the Registry of this
Court.
2. None has appeared on behalf of the applicant in two rounds.
3. Since there is no representation on behalf of the applicant even
in the second round, this Court has left with no other option
but to dismiss the instant civil revision for want of
prosecution.
4. Accordingly, the instant civil revision is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Ankit