Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Chhattisgarh/
  4. 2024/
  5. January

Vinay Netam vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Decided on 31 January 2024• Citation: MCRC/423/2024• High Court of Chhattisgarh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                          -1-                                       
                                                                    NAFR            
                      HIGH COURT   OF CHHATTISGARH,   BILASPUR                      
                                 MCRC  No. 423 of 2024                              
                 Vinay Netam S/o Gopal Singh Netam Aged About 23 Years R/o          
                 Village Chaniyagaon Police Station Dhanora, District Kondagaon     
                 (C.G.)                                                             
                                                              ---- Applicant        
                                        Versus                                      
                 State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Kanker District North 
                 Bastar Kanker (C.G.)                                               
                                                           ---- Respondent          
                  For Applicant    :   Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate                    
                  For State        :   Mr. UKS Chandel, Dy. A.G.                    
                          S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge              
                                       Order On Board                               
                 31/01/2024                                                         
                   1. Applicant has filed this application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
                     for grant of regular bail as he has been arrested in connection
                     with Crime No.372/2023 registered at Police Station – Kanker   
                     District- North Bastar Kanker (CG) for the offence punishable  
                     under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 511, 34 of IPC.             
                   2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the District and   
                     Sessions Judge, North Bastar Kanker lodged a report alleging   
                     that applicant came to join service as Staff Car Driver based on
                     the forged and fabricated document. Based on the report,       
                     applicant was arrested. His memorandum statement was           

                                          -2-                                       
                     recorded in which he stated that on the persuasive statement of
                     Sundar Lal Shori that he can provide the job of Staff Car Driver
                     in High Court, has handed over Rs.2 lakh cash in two           
                     installments and Rs.1.75 lakh by transferring into the bank    
                     account. During course of further investigation, the other     
                     accused persons were also arrested.                            
                   3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has
                     not committed any such offence. Applicant himself is a victim  
                     who  has been cheated by co-accused. He also submits that      
                     transfer order is provided to him by Raju Ratre stating that now
                     he is not required to join in High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur
                     and he is transferred to Kanker. The applicant is in jail since
                     30.09.2023, after completion of investigation charge sheet is  
                     filed, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.                  
                   4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the submission of       
                     learned counsel for the applicant and would submit that as per 
                     material available in the case diary, it is appearing that the 
                     applicant appeared before the District and Sessions Judge,     
                     Uttar Bastar Kanker with forged and fabricated transfer order. 
                     He  do not dispute the submission of learned counsel for the   
                     applicant with regard to memorandum statement and upon         
                     asking, he submits that there is no criminal antecedent of the 
                     applicant.                                                     
                   5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.                 

                                          -3-                                       
                   6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the  
                     case, nature of allegation, memorandum statement of the        
                     accused and further considering that there is no other criminal
                     antecedent of the applicant, offence to be triable by Judicial 
                     Magistrate First Class, period of detention, without commenting
                     anything on merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the bail
                     application.                                                   
                   7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that the
                     applicant shall be released on regular bail on his furnishing a
                     personal bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one local    
                     surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court on the 
                     conditions that:-.                                             
                           a) Applicant shall appear before the trial Court regularly
                           on  each and  every date, unless exempted from           
                           appearance.                                              
                           b) Applicant shall not, in any manner, tamper with the   
                           prosecution witnesses.                                   
                     Certified copy as per rules.                                   
                                                           Sd/-/---/-/---/-/-       
                                                    (Parth Prateem Sahu)            
                                                          Judge                     
          Praveen