Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. High Court Of Chhattisgarh/
  4. 2024/
  5. April

Indrajit Mahto vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Decided on 30 April 2024• Citation: MCRC/3057/2024• High Court of Chhattisgarh
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                             1                                      
                                                                        NAFR        
                         HIGH COURT   of CHHATTISGARH,   BILASPUR                   
                                   MCRC  No. 3057 of 2024                           
                 Indrajit Mahto S/o Ramchandra Mahto Aged About 45  Years R/o      
                  Village Mahmand Laalkhadan, P.S. Torwa, District Bilaspur (C.G.)  
                                                                  ---- Applicant    
                                          Versus                                    
                 State Of  Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Sarkanda, District Bilaspur   
                  (C.G.)                                                            
                                                              ---- Non-Applicant    
                         (Cause Title taken from Case Information System)           
                                 :   Mr. Anway Tiwari, Advocate                     
              For Applicant                                                         
              For Non-Applicant  :   Ms. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer                   
                           Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice                  
                                      Order  on Board                               
             30.04.2024                                                             
                1. This is the second bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code
                  of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant
                  who  has been  arrested in connection with Crime No. 1600/2023    
                  registered at Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the
                  offence punishable under Sections 21 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.  
                2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on a secret information, the
                  applicant was caught  in possession of 665.29 grams  of NRX       
                  dicyclomine hydrochloride acetaminophene capsules and offence was 
                  registered against him.                                           

                                             2                                      
                3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the first bail application
                  was  rejected vide order dated 25.01.2024, therefore this second bail
                  application is filed on the ground that since the seizure witness has
                  turned hostile before the learned trial Court, he prays for releasing the
                  applicant on regular bail.                                        
                4. Considering the above submissions, as the seizure witness has turned
                  hostile, the same cannot be a ground for releasing the applicant on bail
                  as the same amounts to only tampering with the evidence.          
                5. From perusal of the order dated 25.01.2024, it is apparent that the bail
                  application of the applicant was rejected on merits and this Court
                  expressed its hope and trust that the learned trial Court would make its
                  earnest efforts to conclude the trial in accordance with law as   
                  expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from
                  the date of passing of the order, if there was no legal impediment.
                6. No new ground has been raised in this second bail application. More
                  so, as the time period of six months granted to the learned Trial Court
                  from 25.01.2024 has not expired, in such circumstances, this Court
                  deems  it fit that the trial court would conclude the trial within a time
                  period, as has been directed by this Court in the earlier bail rejection
                  order of the applicant, if there is no legal impediment.          
                7. Accordingly, the second bail application of the applicant-Indrajit

                                             3                                      
                  Mahto  filed under Section 439 of the CrPC, involved in Crime No. 
                  1600/2023  registered at Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur
                  (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 21 and 22 of the 
                  N.D.P.S. Act, is rejected at this stage.                          
                       -                                   Sd/-                     
                                                      (Ramesh Sinha)                
                                                     CHIEF JUSTICE                  
             Manpreet