Page No.# 1/7
GAHC030005972019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/25/2019
B Chhoma and 4 Ors.
Khopai, Tuipang, Mizoram 2: HS Vawma
Khopai
Tuipang
Mizoram
3: C Beili
Khopai
Tuipang
Mizoram
4: Beni Chozah
Khopai
Tuipang
Mizora
VERSUS
Subhash Sharma and 14 Ors.
Sena Bhavan B wing, New Delhi 2:Brig Birender Singh
Chief Engineer
BRTF
C/o 99APO
3:R Lalramnghaka
Secretary
Land Revenue and Settlement
Mizoram
4:Bhupesh Chaudary
Deputy Commissioner
Siaha District
Mizoram
Page No.# 2/7
5:N Pachhunga
Senior Revenue Officer
Mara Autonomous District Council
Siaha
6:Sh Manu Prasad
Chief Engineer
Border Road Task Force (BRTF)
Project Pushpak CREF
C/o 99 APO
7:Sh R.Zarzosanga
Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram
Land Revenue and Settlement Dept.
Aizawl
8:Sh Kasavan R
Deputy Commissioner
Siaha Dist.
Siaha
9:Sh P.N.Yadav
Chief Engineer
Border Road Task Force (BRTF)
Project Pushpak CREF
C/o 99 APO
10:Sh Lalsangliana
Deputy Commissioner
Siaha Dist.
11:Sh Pheiki Solo
Senior Revenue Officer
Mara Autonomous District Council
Siaha Dist.
Mizoram
12:Sh S.O.Kolipey
The Chief Engineer
Border Road Task Force (BRTF)
Project Pushpak GREF
C/o 99 APO
13:Sh Lalhmunsanga
Deputy Commissioner
Siaha Dist.
Mizoram
Page No.# 3/7
14:Smt Nazee Khaila
Senior Revenue Officer
Mara Autonomous District Council
Siaha
Mizoram
15:Sh VL Hruaizela Khiangte
Deputy Commissioner
Siaha District
Mizora
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mrs. Dinari T Azyu
Advocate for the Respondent : Ms Zairemsangpuii
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/15/2023
B.Chhoma and 4 Ors.
S/o Vachhai
Khopai
Siaha Dist.
Mizoram
VERSUS
Sh Subhash Sharma and 9 Ors.
Secretary
Border Roads Development Board (BRDB)
Sena Bhavan B Wing
New Delhi-110010
2:Brig
Birender Singh
The Chief Engineer
Border Road Task Force (BRTF)
Project Pushpak GREF
C/o 99 APO
3:Sh R Lalramnghaka
Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram
Land Revenue and Settlement Dept.
Aizawl
Page No.# 4/7
4:Sh Bhupesh Chaudhury
The Deputy Commissioner
Siaha Dist.
Siaha
5:Sh N.Pachhunga
Senior Revenue Officer
Mara Autonomous Dist.
Council
Siaha
Mizoram
6:MANV Prasad
Chief Engineer
BRTF
Project Pushpak GREF
C/o 99 APO
7:Sh R.Zarzosanga
Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram
Land revenue and Settlement Department
8:Sh Kesavan R
Deputy Commissioner
Siaha District
9:Sh P.N.Yadav
Chief Engineer
BRTF
Project Pushpak GREF
C/o 99 APO
10:Sh Lalsangliana
Deputy Commissioner
Siaha District
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu
Advocate for the Respondent : Mrs. Linda L Fambawl for R3 & R7
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/76/2024
B.Chhoma and4 Ors.
S/o Vachhai
Khopai
Siaha District
Page No.# 5/7
Mizoram
VERSUS
Sh Subhash Sharma and12 Ors.
Secretary
Border Roads Development Board (SRDB)
Sena Bhavan 'B' Wing
New Delhi-110010
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu
Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte for R4
R8
R10 & R13
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/49/2021
S Manasia
Khopai Tuipang
VERSUS
Subhash Sharma
New Delhi
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinary T Azyu
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/44/2022
B.Chhoma and 4 Ors.
Khopai
Mizoram
VERSUS
Subhash Sharma and 8 Ors.
Page No.# 6/7
Sena Bhavan 'B' Wing
New Delhi
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu
Advocate for the Respondent : Ms Zairemsangpuii (CGC) for R2
R6 & R9
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/58/2020
B. Chhoma
Khopai
Tuipang
Mizoram
VERSUS
Subhash Sharma
New Delhi
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinary T Azyu
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/146/2024
B.Chhoma and 4 Ors.
S/o Vachhai
R/o Khopai
Siaha District
Mizoram
VERSUS
Sh Subhash Sharma and 13 Ors.
Secretary
Border Roads Development Board (BRDB)
SenaBhavan 'B' Wing
New Delhi-110010
Page No.# 7/7
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu
Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Mary Lalruatkimi Khiangte
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
ORDER
31.01.2025
Mr. Victor L. Ralte, learned counsel for the petitioner is present, while Mrs.
Mary L. Khiangte, learned counsel submits that she will be filing the
Vakalatnama to represent respondent No. 15 during the course of the day and
has prayed for further time to file their show cause reply.
Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned counsel for respondent No. 12, Mr. Roshan
Subedi, learned counsel for respondent No. 5 and Mr. P.C. Lalthangmawia,
learned counsel for respondent No. 14 are present and submit that they have all
filed their show cause reply.
In view of the above, list the matter after 3 (three) weeks for the
learned counsel for respondent No. 15 to file their counter-affidavit.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant