Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Gauhati High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Dilip Tanti vs. the State of Assam and Anr

Decided on 31 May 2024• Citation: Crl.Pet./626/2024• Gauhati High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                                   Page No.# 1/2    
        GAHC010106212024                                                            
                             THE  GAUHATI    HIGH   COURT                           
          (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL  PRADESH)           
                                Case No. : Crl.Pet./626/2024                        
                 DILIP TANTI                                                        
                 S/O LAXMAN TANTI, R/O VILL- BATASIPUR, P.S.-DHEKIAJULI, DIST-      
                 SONITPUR, ASSAM                                                    
                 VERSUS                                                             
                 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR                                         
                 NIL                                                                
                 2:SMTI SACHI TELENGA                                               
                 D/O MAYA TELENGA                                                   
                 VILL- BATASIPUR                                                    
                 P.S.-SONITPUR                                                      
                 DIST- SONITPUR                                                     
                 ASSA                                                               
        Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R BARUAH                                  
        Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM                                     
                                       BEFORE                                       
                       HONOURABLE   MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI                      
                                       ORDER                                        
        Date : 31.05.2024                                                           
        Heard Mr. R.Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr.B.Sharma, learned
        Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent.     
        By this petition under Section 482/401 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for quashing

                                                                   Page No.# 2/2    
        and setting aside of the impugned orders dated 18.03.2024 and 17.05.2024 passed by the
        learned JMFC, Tezpur in PR Case No. 765/2019 (Dhekiajuli PS Case No.665/2014) whereby
        Warrant of Arrest has been issued against the petitioner.                   
        The learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is working in Hyderabad as a
        security guard and he has no knowledge regarding institution of the case. From the order of
        the trial court, it is reflected that summons were issued to the petitioner which was received
        by his sister and thereafter warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner. It is further
        submitted that now the petitioner is ready to appear before the trial court and face the trial.
         Mr.B.Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submits that petitioner has been shown
        as absconder in the charge sheet. However, he may appear before the trial court seeking
        regular bail.                                                               
        Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of documents annexed to the
        application and considering the averments made in the petition, it is provided that the
        petitioner shall appear before the learned trial court within 15 (Fifteen) days from today
        and in the event of filing any bail application, trial court shall consider the same in accordance
        with law. Till his appearance, the execution of the warrant of arrest issued against him shall
        be kept in abeyance subject to the condition that this order shall remain in force till the next
        15 days.                                                                    
        The criminal petition stands disposed of accordingly.                       
                                                          JUDGE                     
        Comparing Assistant