Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Gauhati High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. March

Nur Mohammad vs. the State of Assam

Decided on 28 March 2024• Citation: /801/2024• Gauhati High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                                   Page No.# 1/2    
        GAHC010056022024                                                            
                             THE  GAUHATI    HIGH   COURT                           
          (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL  PRADESH)           
                               Case No. : Bail Appln./801/2024                      
                 NUR MOHAMMAD                                                       
                 S/O JURAN ALI                                                      
                 VILL- LEYABARI                                                     
                 P.S. DHUBAPARA                                                     
                 DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM                                              
                 VERSUS                                                             
                 THE STATE OF ASSAM                                                 
                 TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM                                        
        Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY                            
        Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM                                     
                                       BEFORE                                       
                      HONOURABLE   MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA                     
                                       ORDER                                        
        Date : 28.03.2024                                                           
           Heard Mr. I.A. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned
        Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.                      
             This is an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying for
        grant of bail to the accused/petitioner namely Nur Mohammad, who has been languishing in jail hazot
        in connection with Paltanbazar P.S. Case No.23/2024 under Sections 120B/328/379/507 IPC.

                                                                   Page No.# 2/2    
           Case diary is received. Perused the same.                                
           It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent and his name is not
        mentioned in the First Information Report(FIR) and his is falsely implicated in this case.
           It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is in custody since 54 days and
        hence considering his period of detention, he may be released on bail.      
            In that context, Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that
        sufficient incriminating maters are found in the case diary and he is the mastermind of the entire crime
        which is committed by the other co-accused.                                 
           However, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that considering the period of detention,
        his prayer for bail may be considered.                                      
           Heard the submission made by the learned counsel for both sides.         
           Without going by the merit of the case only considering the length of detention, I find further
        custodial detention is not necessary in this case and hence, I find it a fit case to grant the privilege of
        bail to the petitioner.                                                     
           In view of the above, it is provided that the accused petitioner namely Nur Mohammad will be
        allowed to go on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the
        satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup(M) Guwahati subject to the following
        conditions:-                                                                
                  i.        that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement,
                  threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade
                  him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and
                  ii.   that the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned Chief Judicial
                  Magistrate, Kamrup(M) Guwahati, without prior permission.         
           Accordingly, the Bail Application stands disposed of.                    
           Return the case diary.                                                   
                                                         JUDGE                      
        Comparing Assistant