Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Gauhati High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. February

Shwafikul Islam and 3 Ors. vs. the State of Assam

Decided on 29 February 2024• Citation: /554/2024• Gauhati High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                                   Page No.# 1/3    
        GAHC010040552024                                                            
                             THE  GAUHATI    HIGH   COURT                           
          (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL  PRADESH)           
                               Case No. : Bail Appln./554/2024                      
                 SHWAFIKUL ISLAM AND 3 ORS.                                         
                 S/O ABDUL MOMIN                                                    
                 R/O VILL- MAGURMARI                                                
                 P.S. RUPAHIHAT                                                     
                 DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM                                                
                 2: ROKIBUL ISLAM                                                   
                 S/O ISLAMUDDIN                                                     
                 R/O VILL- BAJIAGAON                                                
                 P.S. SAMAGURI                                                      
                 DIST. NAGAON                                                       
                 ASSAM                                                              
                 3: KHIRAJUL ISLAM                                                  
                 S/O KUDDUS ALI                                                     
                 R/O VILL- PANBARI                                                  
                 P.S. BOKAKHAT                                                      
                 DIST. GOLAGHAT                                                     
                 ASSAM                                                              
                 4: ISHAK ALI                                                       
                 S/O IJAJUL ISLAM                                                   
                 R/O VILL-MAGURMARI                                                 
                 P.S. RUPAHIHAT                                                     
                 DIST. NAGAON                                                       
                 ASSA                                                               
                 VERSUS                                                             
                 THE STATE OF ASSAM                                                 
                 REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM                                              

                                                                   Page No.# 2/3    
        Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T CHUTIA                                  
        Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM                                     
                                      BEFORE                                        
                    HONOURABLE    MRS.  JUSTICE MALASRI   NANDI                     
                                      ORDER                                         
        29.02.2024                                                                  
             Heard Mr. T Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. BB Gogoi,
        learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent State.       
             This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying for bail to the
        petitioners, namely, 1. Shwafikul Islam, 2. Robikul Islam 3. Khirajul Islam and 4. Ishak
        Ali, who were arrested on 13.02.2024 in connection with Basistha Police Station Case
        No.92/2024 under Sections 379/34 IPC read with Section 11(1)(d) of Prevention of
        Cruelty to Animal Act 1960 read with Section 13(1)/16 of the Assam Cattle   
        Preservation Act, 2021.                                                     
             It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are
        in custody since 13.02.2024. The petitioner No.1 is the driver of vehicle bearing
        registration No.AS-02 DC-1861 and the petitioner No.2 is the helper of the said vehicle
        from where 30 numbers of cattles were seized. Whereas, the petitioner No.3 is the
        driver of another vehicle bearing registration No.AS01-QC-2861 and the petitioner
        No.4 is the helper of the said vehicle which was intercepted by police and seized 30
        numbers of cattles from the vehicle in question. According to the learned counsel for
        the petitioners one Chaddam Hussain had purchased the 60 cattles which were seized
        from both the vehicles from the Bihora Weekly Cattle Market and he had produced the
        purchase receipt in respect of the cattles, in question. Accordingly, the learned counsel
        for the petitioners prays that considering the length of detention of the petitioners,

                                                                   Page No.# 3/3    
        they may be granted bail.                                                   
            On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam submits that
        it appears that one person had purchased the cattles, in question from the Bihora
        Weekly Cattle Market and accordingly documents were also produced in support of the
        purchase and therefore the petitioners may be englarged on bail.            
            I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties.
            Considering the length of detention of the petitioners in custody, this Court is
        inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.                                  
            Accordingly, the petitioners above-named, shall be released on bail in connection
        with the aforementioned police station case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-
        (Rupees twenty thousand) each with one suitable surety each of the like amount to
        the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup(M) Guwahati, subject
        to the following conditions that the petitioners:                           
        (a)     shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the learned CJM, Kamrup(M)
        Guwahati without obtaining prior written permission;                        
        (b)    shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the
        case; and                                                                   
        (c)    shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to
        any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
        such facts to the Court or to any police officer.                           
            The bail application, accordingly, stands disposed of.                  
                                                                      JUDGE         
        Comparing Assistant