Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Calcutta High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Mahasin Biswas vs. State of West Bengal

Decided on 30 May 2024• Citation: CRM (NDPS)/897/2024• Calcutta High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


            D/L. 40.                                                                
           May 30, 2024                                                             
           MNS/MB                                                                   
                                        CRM  (NDPS) 897 of 2024                     
                     In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
                     Procedure filed on 21.05.2024 in connection with Swarupnagar Police Station
                     Case No. 219 of 2023 dated 05.04.2023 under Section 21(C) of the Narcotic
                     Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.                   
                                                 And                                
                     In the matter of: Mahasin Biswas                               
                                                                     …. Petitioner  
                     Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty,                                     
                     Mr. Shashanka Sekhar Saha                                      
                                                               … for the petitioner 
                     Mr. Rana Mukherjee,                                            
                     Mr. Aritra Bhattacharya                                        
                                                                   … for the State. 
                     1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was
                        arrested on April 4, 2023 and since then he is in custody.  
                     2. Twenty-five bottles of phensedyl were recovered from the possession of
                        the present petitioner.                                     
                     3. It has been submitted that charge has been framed. Till now no witnesses
                        has been examined, although there are eleven witnesses to be examined
                        by the prosecution in order to prove the case.              
                     4. Mr. Mukherjee, learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the
                        prayer for bail and submits that in view of the rigours of Section 37 of the
                        Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the petitioner
                        should not be released on bail.                             
                     5. However, having considered the fact that more than thirteen and half
                        months have passed and on the last schedule, no witnesses were present

                                            2                                       
                        in court and the next date is fixed in the month of July, 2024, we are of the
                        opinion that there is no chance of the trial being concluded very soon.
                     6. Having regard to the observation of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rabi
                        Prakash Vs. State of Odisha reported in 2023 SCC online 1109, wherein
                        the Hon’ble Supreme Court was pleased to hold that the liberty of the
                        accused persons must override the statutory embargo under Section 37 of
                        the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, we are of the
                        view that the petitioner should be released on bail.        
                     7. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 897 of 2024 is allowed, thereby granting bail to
                        the petitioner on condition that the petitioner shall furnish bond of
                        Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be
                        local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions
                               th                                                   
                        Judge, 6 Court, Barasat, District – North 24 Parganas/learned Chief
                        Judicial Magistrate, Barasat, District – North 24 Parganas. 
                     8. If on bail, the petitioner shall make himself present on each and every date
                        fixed before the learned trial court.                       
                     9. The learned special Judge will be at liberty to impose any other condition
                        to ensure the availability of the petitioner.               
                     10. It is further directed that the trial of the case would continue inspite of any
                        Resolution of the local Bar and no adjournment should be granted to the
                        parties, if the prosecution witness is present on the date so fixed.
                     11. In violation of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Special Judge will be
                        at liberty to cancel the bail without further reference to this Court.
                     12. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from
                        the official website of this Court.                         
                                                     (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)         
                                                    (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)