Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Calcutta High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Dipak Das vs. State of West Bengal

Decided on 30 May 2024• Citation: CRM (DB)/1730/2024• Calcutta High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


           30.05.2024                                                               
           Item No.18                                                               
           Ct. No. 8                                                                
           CHC/ S.De                                                                
           Allowed                                                                  
          (VACATION BENCH)                                                          
                                           C.R.M.(DB) 1730 of 2024                  
                        In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of
                        Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with Pragati Maidan 
                        Police Station Case No. 53 of 2024 dated 27.03.2024 under   
                        Sections 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code.                   
                                                   And                              
                        In the matter of : Dipak Das                                
                                                              ...… petitioner       
                             Mr. Pritam Roy,                                        
                             Mr. Soewel Bhattacharya,                               
                             Ms. Sarmistha Basak                                    
                                           .…for the petitioner                     
                             Mr. Arindam Sen,                                       
                             Mr. Bikram Mitra                                       
                                           .…for the State                          
                             Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits  
                        that the petitioner is in custody for 62 days and the incident if
                        at all accepted to be true in its entirety was on grave and 
                        sudden provocation and there was no guilty mind attached so 
                        far as the present petitioner is concerned.                 
                             Learned  advocate for the  petitioner under such       
                        circumstances submits that the petitioner be released on bail
                        on any stringent condition.                                 
                             Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail
                        and draws the attention of the Court to the injury report as also
                        the Post Mortem Report and submits that because of the head 
                        injury, the victim succumbed to the injuries and it is the  
   Signed By :                                                                      
   CHINMOY                                                                          
   CHAKRABORTY                                                                      
   High Court of                                                                    
   Calcutta                                                                         
   30 th of May 2024                                                                
   08:15:20 PM                                                                      

                                                  2                                 
                        petitioner who was principally involved in commission of the
                        alleged offence.                                            
                             We have taken into account the submissions as well as  
                        the materials appearing in the Case Diary and having regard to
                        the period of detention of the present petitioner and the fact
                        that all the accused persons have been arrested in connection
                        with the instant case, as also the fact that there was no pre-
                        concerted design in the alleged commission of the offence, we
                        are of the view that further detention of the petitioner is 
                        unwarranted in the facts and circumstances of the present   
                        case.                                                       
                             Accordingly, the petitioner shall furnish a bond of    
                        Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of 
                        like amount each, one  of whom  must  be local, to the      
                        satisfaction of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,
                        Alipore, South 24 Parganas. If on bail, the petitioner shall meet
                        with the Investigating Officer of the case once in a week till the
                        submission of the charge-sheet. If the presence of the petitioner
                        is further required or his appearance is to be ensured before the
                        Trial Court, prosecution/investigating agency will advance such
                        prayer which the Learned A.C.J.M., Alipore who will consider
                        the same after submission of the charge-sheet. If the petitioner
                        intends to leave the jurisdiction of the District of Kolkata, and
                        24 Parganas (South), petitioner shall seek permission from the
                        Learned A.C.J.M., Alipore or the Trial Court in seisin of the
                        case.                                                       

                                                  3                                 
                             Any violation of condition of the bail will entitle the
                        Learned Trial Court or the Learned Magistrate in seising of the
                        matter to cancel the bail without further reference to this Court.
                             This application for bail is, thus, allowed.           
                             CRM(DB) 1730 of 2024 is disposed of.                   
                                                     (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)         
                                                     (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)