Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Calcutta High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Abhijit Deb @ Arayan vs. State of West Bengal

Decided on 30 May 2024• Citation: CRM (NDPS)/890/2024• Calcutta High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


            30.05.2024                                                              
                                      C.R.M. (NDPS) 890 of 2024                     
            pg/tkm/ct 8                                                             
            sl no. 34                                                               
                         In Re : An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal
                         Procedure in connection with Titagarh PS Case no. 38 of 2022 dated
                         15.1.2022 under sections 21(c)of the NDPS Act              
                                        and                                         
                         In Re : Abhijit Deb @ Aryan        ..… petitioner          
                              Mr. D Kar                                             
                              Mr. Arka Tilak Bhadra                                 
                                                       …… for the petitioner        
                              Ms. Amita Gaur                                        
                              Ms. Sudeshna Das                                      
                                                                State               
                                                       …… for the                   
                         1.   Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the  
                         petitioner is in custody since 15th January 2022 and there was
                         seizure from the possession of the present petitioner. However,
                         according to the learned advocate, more than 29 months have
                         passed and only five witnesses out of nine witnesses have been
                         examined.                                                  
                         2.    Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail
                         and draws attention of this court to the order passed on 24th
                         November 2023.                                             
                         3.   We  have considered the totality of the circumstances 
                         including the period of detention of the present petitioner. It has
                         been pointed out that the next schedule before the learned special
                         court has been fixed on 26th June 2024.                    
                         4.   We direct that the learned trial court to fix the schedule
                         consisting of three dates and fix such schedule once in every
                         month. Prosecution witnesses should be completed within a  
                         period of three months from 26th June 2024. Trial of the case
                         would continue in spite of any resolution of the local bar and

                                                    2                               
                         representing advocates will not deter the progress of the trial in
                         case any witness for the prosecution is present.           
                         5.   We  direct that in spite of compliance of the aforesaid
                         conditions if the prosecution witnesses are not completed within a
                         period of three months form date, on an application for bail being
                         preferred by the present petitioner, learned trial court will be at
                         liberty to release the petitioner on bail on such terms and
                         conditions as it deems fit and proper.                     
                         6.   With the aforesaid observations, CRM (NDPS) 890 of 2024 is
                         disposed of.                                               
                         7.   All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this
                         order duly downloaded from the official website of this court.
                         (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)        (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)