Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Calcutta High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. May

Ajgar Dalal vs. Union of India

Decided on 30 May 2024• Citation: CRM (NDPS)/887/2024• Calcutta High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


            30.05.2024                                                              
                                      C.R.M. (NDPS) 887 of 2024                     
            pg/tkm/ct 8                                                             
            sl no. 32                                                               
                         In Re : An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal
                         Procedure in connection with NCB Crime no. 08/NCB/KOL/2021 dated
                         under sections 21(c)/22(a)/29 of the NDPS Act              
                                        and                                         
                         In Re : Ajgar Dalal                ..… petitioner          
                              Mr. Angsuman Chakrabory                               
                              Mr. S S Saha                                          
                                                       …… for the petitioner        
                              Mr. Anjan Sengupta                                    
                              Mr. Tapan Bhanja                                      
                                                                NCB                 
                                                       …… for the                   
                         1.   Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the  
                         petitioner is in custody for three years and four months and out of
                         six witnesses so cited by the prosecution, three witnesses have
                         been examined and  another three witnesses are yet to be   
                         examined. Accordingly, learned advocate for the petitioner prays
                         for bail on any stringent condition.                       
                         2.   Learned advocate for the Narcotics Control Bureau submits
                         that the prosecution has been trying their best to conclude the
                         trial within the period so fixed by the Division Bench in CRM
                         (NDPS) 1651 of 2023, we find that the said order of the Division
                         bench was passed on 10th October 2023 and since then seven 
                         months have already been passed.                           
                         3.   Having considered the prayer so advanced by the Narcotics
                         Control Bureau as well as the by the petitioner in the peculiar
                         circumstances of the present case, we direct that the Narcotics
                         Control Bureau  /prosecution agency shall conclude the     
                         prosecution evidence within a period of three moths from date.

                                                    2                               
                         4.   Learned trial court is directed to fix the schedule consisting
                         of three dates and fix such schedule once in every month. Trial of
                         the case would continue in spite of any resolution of the local bar
                         and representing advocates will not deter the progress of the trial
                         in case any witness for the prosecution is present.        
                         5.   We  direct that in spite of compliance of the aforesaid
                         conditions if the prosecution witnesses are not completed within a
                         period of three months form date, on an application for bail being
                         preferred by the present petitioner, learned trial court will be at
                         liberty to release the petitioner on bail on such terms and
                         conditions as it deems fit and proper.                     
                         6.   With the aforesaid observations, CRM (NDPS) 887 of 2024 is
                         disposed of.                                               
                         7.   All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this
                         order duly downloaded from the official website of this court.
                         (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)        (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)