Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Calcutta High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. March

Manju Devi and Anr. vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Decided on 28 March 2024• Citation: WPA/8703/2024• Calcutta High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                Item No. 04                                                         
                                          In the High Court At Calcutta             
                                         Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction           
                                                Appellate Side                      
                  28.03.2024                                                        
                    Ct-24                                                           
                    AGM                                                             
                                              WPA 8703 of 2024                      
                                            Manju Devi Shaw & Ors.                  
                                                     v.                             
                                          State of West Bengal & Ors.               
                                    Mr. Prosenjit Mukherjee.                        
                                    Mr. Ayan Banerjee.                              
                                    Mr. Joy Chakraborty.                            
                                    Mr. Ranjit Malakar.                             
                                             … for the petitioners.                 
                                    Mr. Pritam Chowdhury.                           
                                    Mr. Gaurav Banerjee.                            
                                                 … for the State.                   
                                    Ms. Mekhla Sinha.                               
                                    Ms. Malabika Roy Dey.                           
                                                  … for the Howrah Zilla Parishad.  
                                    Mr. Animesh Paul.                               
                                                  … For the private respondent.     
                                    Order of demolition dated 2nd May, 2023 passed by
                               the District Engineer, Howrah Zilla Parishad is      
                               impugned in the present writ petition. Specific grievance
                               of the petitioners is that the District Engineer does not
                               have the jurisdiction to pass the order of demolition.
                                    Reliance has been placed on Section 160A of the 
                               West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 as amended.          
                                    Learned  advocate representing the private      
                               respondent submits  that  the  District Engineer     
                               considered the matter in compliance of the direction 

                                                      2                             
                               passed by this Court on 02.01.2023 in WPA 25580 of   
                               2020 (Sri Ajit Pandey –Vs- The State of West Bengal &
                               Ors.).                                               
                                    On a perusal of the aforesaid order it appears that
                               the Court was pleased to direct the competent authority
                               of the Howrah Zilla Parishad to proceed in accordance
                               with law and reach the issues raised by the petitioners
                               to its logical conclusion.                           
                                    The  order  further mentions that  if any       
                               unauthorised construction is detected, the authority 
                               concerned shall act and proceed as per Rule 28 of the
                               West   Bengal    Panchayat   (Gram    Panchayat      
                               Administration) Rules, 2004.                         
                                    Section 160A of the West Bengal Panchayat Act,  
                               1973 as amended mentions that where a new structure  
                               or new building or any addition to any structure or  
                               building is being or has been erected or made, as the
                               case may be, in contravention of the provisions of sub-
                               section (1), the matter shall be heard by a Hearing  
                               Officer who shall preferably be a retired senior     
                               Government Officer with the experience of having     
                               worked as a Magistrate and shall be appointed in the 
                               Zilla Parishad by the State Government. The Hearing  
                               Officer shall, after giving the owner of such building an
                               opportunity of being heard, submit his recommendation
                               to the Executive Officer of the Zilla Parishad. The  

                                                      3                             
                               Executive Officer of the Zilla Parishad shall take decision
                               for demolition of the building or a portion of the   
                               building, as the case may be, by the owner within such
                               period as may be specified in the order and in default,
                               issue direction to the Sub Divisional Officer concerned to
                               effect the demolition and to recover the cost thereof from
                               the owner as a public demand.                        
                                    The aforesaid provision has been inserted by the
                               West Bengal Panchayat (Amendment) Act, 2017 and the  
                               same came into effect on and from 09.11.2017.        
                                    In the present case, the construction in question
                               took place after the amendment came into effect and, 
                               accordingly, the provision of Section 160A ought to have
                               been followed at the time of passing the order of    
                               demolition. Aforesaid provision does not permit the  
                               District Engineer to pass any order of demolition.   
                                    It appears that the District Engineer, Howrah Zilla
                               Parishad did not have the authority to pass such order.
                                    On this ground alone, the impugned order of     
                               demolition is liable to set aside and is, accordingly, set
                               aside.                                               
                                    The authority as specified under Section 160A is
                               directed to take steps in the matter in accordance with
                               law to  deal with  the unauthorized construction     
                               complained of by the private respondent.             

                                                      4                             
                                    Steps shall be taken in the matter at the earliest
                               but positively within a period of four months from the
                               date of communication of this order.                 
                                    The  parties shall be  afforded reasonable      
                               opportunity of hearing at the time of consideration of the
                               representation filed by the private respondent alleging
                               unauthorised construction.                           
                                    The parties will be at liberty to rely upon all 
                               documents in support of their individual stand before
                               the competent authority.                             
                                    All consequential steps shall be taken by the   
                               competent authority in accordance with law.          
                                    The writ petition stands disposed of.           
                                    Urgent certified copy of this order, if applied for,
                               be supplied to the parties expeditiously, on compliance
                               of usual legal formalities.                          
                                                             (Amrita Sinha, J.)