Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Calcutta High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. July

Jahiruddin Islam and Anr vs. State of West Bengal

Decided on 31 July 2024• Citation: CRM (A)/3858/2023• Calcutta High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


           31.07.2024                                                               
           Court No.29                                                              
           Item No. 16                                                              
             sg                                                                     
                                         CRM  (A) 3858 of 2023                      
                       In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of
                       Criminal Procedure read with Section 482 of the BNSS.        
                                      And                                           
                       In Re: Jahiruddin Islam @ Jahiruddin Rahman & Anr.           
                                                 Petitioners                        
                       Ms. Jeenia Rudra                                             
                                               For the Petitioners                  
                       Ms. Jonaki Saha                                              
                                               For the State                        
                       1. The victim had died within four years of marriage.        
                          Considering the materials available in the case diary, the nature and extent of
                       2.                                                           
                          involvement of the petitioners in the commission of alleged offence and in
                          view of the statement of the neighbours implicating the petitioners along with
                          the post mortem report, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the
                          present petitioners.                                      
                          Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.
                       3.                                                           
                                                                 (Soumen Sen, J.)   
                                                                 (Uday Kumar, J.)