Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Calcutta High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. August

Sanjoy Roy vs. W.b State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. & Ors

Decided on 30 August 2024• Citation: WPA/137/2010• Calcutta High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                      D/L.72.                                                       
                      August 30, 2024.                                              
                      KAUSHIK                                                       
                                                WPA No. 137 of 2010                 
                                                   Sanjoy Roy                       
                                                      Vs.                           
                                               WBSEDCL  and Others                  
                                        Mr. Sumit Roy                               
                                                  … for the WBSEDCL                 
                                        This matter had been appearing in the       
                                             .                                      
                                   ‘Warning List’                                   
                                        None appears on behalf of the petitioner    
                                   nor is any adjournment prayed for on his behalf  
                                   even in the second call.                         
                                        The respondent is represented.              
                                        The writ petition has been pending since    
                                   2010. It is evident that the petitioner is not   
                                   interested in proceeding with this writ petition.
                                        In view of the above, WPA No. 137 of        
                                   2010 stands dismissed for default.               
                                        Interim orders, if any, stands vacated.     
                                                     (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)