Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Bombay High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. September

Murlidhar S. Choudhary Thr. Constituted Attorney Uttam S/o Gulabchand Keshyap and Others vs. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Decided on 30 September 2024• Citation: CAO/1224/2024• Bombay High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


    2024:BHC-NAG:10962-DB                                                         
                                           1                     cao1224.2024     
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY               
                                  NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR                           
                            CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1224/2024                  
                                           IN                                     
                                M.C.A. (REVIEW) NO.122/2024                       
                                           IN                                     
                                WRIT PETITION NO.8200/2019                        
                 (Murlidhar S/o Shankarrao Choudhary and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others)
             - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
            Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,    Court's or Judge's orders 
            appearances, Court's orders of directions                             
            and Registrar's orders                                                
            - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                          Mr. Harish Dangre, Advocate with Mr. A.D. Chaudhari, Advocate for the
                          applicants.                                             
                          CORAM: VINAY JOSHI & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.         
                          DATED: 30.9.2024.                                       
                                   Heard.                                         
                          2.       The applicants’ learned Advocate seeks leave to
                          amend the review application to add certain more grounds in
                          support of the review petition.                         
                          3.       We see no difficulty in allowing the application
                          hence it is allowed. Necessary amendment be carried out 
                          within one week.                                        
                          CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1231/2024                    
                          4.       The applicants seek to add the parties who were
                          present before this Court in writ petition in the capacity of
                          intervenors. Certainly they have a right to contest. Hence
                          application is allowed. Leave granted to add the parties.
                          Necessary amendment be carried out within one week.     
                          5.       Issue notice to the intervenors returnable after
                          vacation.                                               
                          (MRS.VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, J.)          (VINAY JOSHI, J.)   
            Tambaskar.