Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Bombay High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. September

Ms Laxmi Constriction Through Its Prop Radhakishan Narayan Waghmare and Another vs. the Union of India Through Its Secretary and Others

Decided on 30 September 2024• Citation: WP/10222/2024• Bombay High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


    2024:BHC-AUG:23533-DB                                                         
                                                                   10222.24wp     
                                              (1)                                 
                      IN THE HIGH   COURT  OF  JUDICATURE    AT BOMBAY            
                                   BENCH  AT  AURANGABAD                          
                              17 WRIT  PETITION  NO. 10222 OF 2024                
                          M/S LAXMI CONSTRICTION   THROUGH   ITS PROP.            
                      RADHAKISHAN    NARAYAN   WAGHMARE   AND  ANOTHER            
                                            VERSUS                                
                       THE UNION  OF INDIA THROUGH   ITS SECRETARY AND            
                                            OTHERS                                
                                                ….                                
                    Mr P. D. Bachate, Advocate for Petitioners                    
                    Mr R. B. Bhosale, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.1        
                                         CORAM   : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE              
                                                         AND                      
                                                  Y. G. KHOBRAGADE,  JJ.          
                                          DATE   : 30th September, 2024           
                    PER COURT:                                                    
                    1.        The learned Advocate for the Petitioners invited our
                    attention to the order passed by the learned Debts Recovery   
                    Tribunal, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar (Tribunal), which is      
                    disobeyed by Respondent Nos.3 and 4/private individuals. The  
                    learned Advocate submits that this Court should take cognizance
                    of the disobedience of the order under the Contempt of Courts 
                    Act.                                                          
                    2.        It is well settled that a Tribunal is not a Court.  

                                                                   10222.24wp     
                                              (2)                                 
                    3.        In view of the above, this Writ Petition is not     
                    maintainable before this Court, and the same is disposed off. If
                    the Petitioners desire to get the order of the learned Tribunal
                    executed, they are at liberty to avail of a remedy, as is permissible
                    in law.                                                       
                     (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE,  J.)     (RAVINDRA  V. GHUGE,  J.)        
                    sjk