Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Bombay High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. October

Abul Ala Hashmi Khuram Ali Hashmi vs. the State of Maharashtra

Decided on 29 October 2024• Citation: BA/1944/2024• Bombay High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


    2024:BHC-AUG:26613                                                            
                                            1                                     
                        IN THE HIGH COURT  OF JUDICATURE  AT BOMBAY               
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD                           
                           939 BAIL APPLICATION  NO. 1944 OF 2024                 
                          ABUL  ALA HASHMI  KHURAM   ALI HASHMI                   
                                          VERSUS                                  
                                THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA                          
                                            …..                                   
                          Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shaikh Mohseen Iman        
                               APP for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Dande                
                              Advocate for assist to PP : Mr. M.D. Gitte          
                                             …                                    
                                     CORAM     : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.           
                                                 (VACATION COURT)                 
                                     DATE      : 29 OCTOBER  2024                 
                  PER COURT :                                                     
                           Heard learned Advocate Mr. Shaikh Mohseen Iman for     
                  the applicant and learned APP Mr. Dande for the respondent/state.
                  2.       The applicant is seeking regular bail as he is behind bar
                  since 30.09.2024 in Crime  No.  480/2024  registered with       
                  Cantonment  Police Station, Aurangabad, for  the offences       
                  punishable under Sections 109, 126 (2), 115 (2), 351 (2), 351 (3),
                  3 (5) of Bhartiya Nyay Sahinta, 2023.                           
                  3.       This matter was mentioned in the vacation expressing   
                  urgency on the medical ground of the applicant. However, while  
                  considering the matter the parties agreed for consideration of  
                  merits also. Under these circumstances, though the next date in 
                  the bail application is of 14.11.2024, I am deciding the matter.
                  4.       Informant is the nephew of the applicant and also son- 
                  in-law. There were matrimonial disputes between informant and   

                                            2                                     
                  applicant’s daughter Hatija Fatema which resulted in dissolution of
                  marriage. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that
                  due to the disputes between the applicant and the informant there
                  is false implication in the offence in question. It is further  
                  submitted that applicant is suffering from Cancer since 2021 and
                  he wants to have better treatment. Learned counsel also places on
                  record order dated 21.10.2024 passed in the matter of co-accused
                  in ABA No. 1784/2024.                                           
                  5.       Learned APP submits that there are direct allegations  
                  against the applicant and the co-accused. This is not a fit case to
                  enlarge the applicant on bail. The investigation is yet to be   
                  completed.                                                      
                  6.       I have gone  through first information report. It is   
                  alleged that on 29.09.2024 the applicant and the co-accused had 
                  confrontation with the informant and they demanded him to       
                  transfer house in their name. It is alleged that the applicant tried
                  to inflict blow by knife on the informant. The co-accused assaulted
                  him by iron rod. The applicant poured petrol on the person of the
                  informant and tried to set him ablaze.                          
                  7.       I have gone through the police papers and especially   
                  the medical certificate. The injuries are simple in nature. It can be
                  gathered from the police papers that the beatings to the informant
                  is not serious in nature rather it appears to be exaggeration. Due to
                  the disputes between the accused and the informant, in all      
                  probabilities the false implication cannot be ruled out.        

                                            3                                     
                  8.       Co-accused Abul  Hasan  Khuram  Ali Hashmi  was        
                  granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated        
                  21.10.2024 in ABA No. 1784/2024. It further reveals from record 
                  that since 2021 applicant is suffering from carcinoma of right side
                  tongue and is under medication. There is no reason to doubt that
                  the applicant needs further treatment for the ailment. Considering
                  over all circumstances, the applicant deserves to be released on
                  bail. Hence, I pass following order :                           
                                           ORDER                                  
                           i.   Bail Application is allowed.                      
                           ii.  The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on        
                           furnishing P.R. bond and  cash surety of Rs.           
                           30,000/-.                                              
                           iii. He  shall not  in any  way  contact the           
                           informant  and he  shall co-operate with the           
                           Investigating officer.                                 
                                               [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ]         
                  Thakur-Chauhan/-