2024:BHC-AUG:30141
( 1 )
23-28-49, 51 w
IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT,
HELD ON 30th NOVEMBER 2024,
AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE
AT AURANGABAD
23 FIRST APPEAL NO. 668 OF 2010
The Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Divn 1
VERSUS
The State Of Mah And Ors
AND
24 FIRST APPEAL NO. 669 OF 2010
The Ex Eng. Dhule Medium Project Dhule
VERSUS
The State Of Mah And Ors
AND
25 FIRST APPEAL NO. 670 OF 2010
The Ex Eng. Dhule Medium Project Dhule
VERSUS
The State Of Mah And Ors
AND
26 FIRST APPEAL NO. 673 OF 2010
The Ex Eng. Dhule Medium Project Dhule
VERSUS
The State Of Mah And Ors
AND
27 FIRST APPEAL NO. 674 OF 2010
The Ex Eng. Dhule Medium Project Dhule
VERSUS
The State Of Mah And Ors
AND
28 FIRST APPEAL NO. 903 OF 2010
( 2 )
23-28-49, 51 w
Exe Engineer Medium Project No.1 Dhule
VERSUS
Ramkorbai Sardar Rajput And Anr
AND
33 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1415 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No. 1 Dhule
VERSUS
Vitthalsingh Lotansingh Girase And Anr
AND
34 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1416 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No. 1 Dhule
VERSUS
Sawalu Gangaram Thelari And Anr
AND
35 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1420 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No. 1 Dhule
VERSUS
Prashant Bhatu Ahire And Anr
AND
36 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1422 OF 2010
Exe Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No.1
VERSUS
Piransingh Rajesingh Girase And Anr
AND
37 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1424 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No. 1 Dhule
VERSUS
Aliyar Gulab Patve And Anr
AND
38 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1425 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No. 1 Dhule
VERSUS
( 3 )
23-28-49, 51 w
Dadamiya Suleman Shah And Anr
AND
39 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1646 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No. 1 Dhule
VERSUS
Popat Uda Thelari And Anr
AND
41 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1648 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Project Division No 1
VERSUS
Gangaji Thansingh Rajput And Anr
AND
42 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1649 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No. 1
VERSUS
Manik Daji Thelari (deceased) Th Lrs Ravan Manik Thelari And Ors.
AND
43 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1651 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Project Division No 1
VERSUS
Uttam Bhattu Thelari And Ors
AND
44 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1652 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Divn No 1 Dhule
VERSUS
Arun Nimba Devre And Ors
AND
45 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1654 OF 2010
Exe Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No.1
VERSUS
Dagadu Bhika Patil And Anr
AND
( 4 )
23-28-49, 51 w
46 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1655 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No 1 Dhule
VERSUS
Ratan Sawalu Thelari And Anr
AND
47 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1656 OF 2010
The Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Divn No. 1 Dhule
VERSUS
Shashikant Maharubagull And Ors
AND
48 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1657 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No 1 Dhule
VERSUS
Manku Lahanu Thelari And Anr
AND
49 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1658 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Dhule Medium Project Division No 1 Dhule
VERSUS
Natthu Bhaurao Thelari And Anr
AND
51 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1700 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Medium Project Divn No. 1 Dhule Sinchan Bhavan
Sakri Road Dhule
VERSUS
Ananda Indra Bhil And Ors
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1703 OF 2010
Executive Engineer Medium Project Division No.1
VERSUS
Gulab Chanda Bhil And Anr
...
( 5 )
23-28-49, 51 w
Mr.Chetan T. Jadhav, Advocate for Appellant-Acquiring Body.
Mr. Ajay Pawar Advocate for Appellant-Acquiring Body.
Mr. Vishal Ghode, Asst. Engineer, Grade-I for DMPD.
O R D E R
(30th NOVEMBER 2024)
1. These appeals are placed before us in today’s National Lok Adalat.
2. Mr.Chetan Jadhav and Mr.Ajay Pawar, the learned Advocates for
the appellant-Acquiring Body alongwith Mr. Vishal Ghode, Assistant
Engineer, Grade-I for DMPD are present.
3. The learned Advocates for the appellants-Acquiring Body
submitted that above numbered group of first appeals is squarely
covered by the Government Resolution No.
Sankirna-2014/pra.kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 3rd November, 2016 with
Government Corrigendum dated 23rd February, 2017 and 13th August
2018 to the said Government Resolution. In turn, these appeals can be
withdrawn as per the policy decision taken by the Government of
Maharashtra. Accordingly, the appellant/Acquiring Body are
withdrawing these appeals, communication/letter to that extent is
placed on record and marked “X” for identification.
( 6 )
23-28-49, 51 w
4. The learned Advocate for the appellant/Acquiring Body submits
that the entire amount of the compensation is deposited. The claimants
are entitled to receive the amount along with accrued interest thereon, if
the amount is not withdrawn by the claimants.
5. However, before disposing of the appeals it is further clarified that
in case, if any, amount is lying with this Court, then same shall be
transmitted to the concerned reference Court. The Reference Court shall
disburse the said amount to the claimants without requiring any formal
application for withdrawal.
6. The learned Advocates for the Appellant/Acquiring Body further
submits that in these circumstances, nothing survive in these appeals,
appeals stand disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
7. Award be drawn up accordingly.
8. In view of disposal of the appeals, pending civil applications, if
any, stand disposed off.
9. The Court fee refund certificate be issued as per the provisions
under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act.
[A. B. KADETHANKAR] [S. G. SHETE] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]
Advocate DJ (Retd.) Head of Panel
Member Member