Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Bombay High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. July

Pundlik Kashinath Pandit vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Decided on 31 July 2024• Citation: ABA/1094/2024• Bombay High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


    2024:BHC-AUG:16230                                                            
                                               1                                  
                                                                    1094.2024ABA.odt
                        IN THE HIGH COURT  OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,               
                                   BENCH  AT AURANGABAD.                          
                    987 ANTICIPATORY  BAIL APPLICATION   NO. 1094 OF 2024         
                                PUNDLIK  KASHINATH   PANDIT                       
                                           VERSUS                                 
                         THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA    AND  ANOTHER                 
                                             ...                                  
                  Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Satej S                     
                  APP for Respondent/State : Mr.N.B. Patil                        
                                             ...                                  
                                          CORAM   : SHIVKUMAR  DIGE, J.           
                                          DATE    : 31st July, 2024.              
                  P.C.:                                                           
                  1.   Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP.   
                  2.   After hearing for some time, when this Court expressed     
                  disinclination to allow the application, the learned counsel for the
                  applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application.
                  3.   Leave granted. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.  
                                                    [ SHIVKUMAR  DIGE, J. ]       
             sga