Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Bombay High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. January

Sunil Ramesh Karotiya vs. the State of Maharashtra

Decided on 31 January 2024• Citation: BA/619/2023• Bombay High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                         17-BA651-2023+.DOC       
                                                                   Santosh        
                      IN THE HIGH COURT  OF  JUDICATURE  AT BOMBAY                
                            CRIMINAL  APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                     
                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 651 OF 2023                     
      SANTOSH                                                                     
                  Harshal Manohar Bendre                      ...Applicant        
      SUBHASH                                                                     
      KULKARNI                                                                    
                                     Versus                                       
      Digitally signed by                                                         
      SANTOSH SUBHASH                                                             
                  The State of Maharashtra                  …Respondent           
      KULKARNI                                                                    
      Date: 2024.02.01                                                            
      10:54:21 +0530                                                              
                                          WITH                                    
                            BAIL APPLICATION  NO. 619 OF 2023                     
                  Sunil Ramesh Karotiya                       ...Applicant        
                                     Versus                                       
                  The State of Maharashtra                  …Respondent           
                  Mr. Raju Suryawanshi, for the Applicant.                        
                  Mr. M. G. Patil, APP for the State/Respondent.                  
                                         CORAM:   N. J. JAMADAR, J.               
                                         DATED:   31st JANUARY, 2024              
                  PC:-                                                            
                  1.   Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.                 
                  2.   Mr.  Suryawanshi,  the  learned  Counsel  for the          
                  applicant, on instructions, submits that the  trial has         
                  reached an advanced stage and Investigating Officer is being    
                  examined.                                                       
                  3.   In view of the aforesaid statement and having regard to    
                  the fact that the trial has reached an advanced stage as only   
                  the Investigating Officers are to be examined   by the          
                                            1/2                                   

                                                         17-BA651-2023+.DOC       
                  prosecution, there is a likelihood that the trial may conclude  
                  within a reasonable period.                                     
                  4.   Nonetheless having  regard to  the  fact that the          
                  applicants are in custody since May, 2016, the  learned         
                  Additional Sessions Judge seized with Session Case No.278 of    
                  2016 arising out of CR No.97 of 2016 is requested to give       
                  priority to the said Session Case and conclude the trial as     
                  expeditiously as possible.                                      
                  5.   Applications stand disposed.                               
                                                    [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]           
                                            2/2