Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Bombay High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. December

Gajanan S/o Nivrutti Mankar vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Pso Ps Shegaon Dist Buldana

Decided on 27 December 2024• Citation: ABA/837/2024• Bombay High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


    2024:BHC-NAG:14168                                                            
                                           1                   aba 837.2024.doc   
                    IN THE   HIGH  COURT   OF  JUDICATURE    AT  BOMBAY           
                                 NAGPUR    BENCH,   NAGPUR                        
                      CRIMINAL   APPLICATION    (ABA)  NO. 837 OF  2024           
                             ( Gajanan s/o Nivrutti Mankar vs. State of Maharashtra )
                    Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram,                     
                    appearances, Court's orders of direction, Court's or Judge's order
                    and the Registrar's orders.                                   
                          Mr. H.V.Dhage, Advocate for the applicant.              
                          Mr. U.R.Phasate, APP for non-applicant State.           
                          CORAM  : ABHAY J. MANTRI , JJ.                          
                          D ATE  : DECEMBER  27, 2024                             
                              The application is circulated today as the applicant
                    wants to withdraw it because it is infructuous. During the    
                    pendency of the application, the applicant was arrested, so the
                    application became infructuous.                               
                    2)       In view of the same, the application stands dismissed
                    as infructuous.                                               
                                                   ( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. )        
                    KOLHE