Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Bombay High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. December

Mayur Anil Satpute vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Decided on 24 December 2024• Citation: ABA/2033/2024• Bombay High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


    2024:BHC-AUG:30799                                                            
                                               1                                  
                                                                   2031.2024ABA+.odt
                        IN THE HIGH COURT  OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,               
                                   BENCH  AT AURANGABAD.                          
                       ANTICIPATORY  BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2031 OF 2024            
                                  BHUSHAN  HARI CHAUGULE                          
                                          VERSUS                                  
                          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA   AND ANOTHER                  
                                            WITH                                  
                       ANTICIPATORY  BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2033 OF 2024            
                                    MAYUR  ANIL SATPUTE                           
                                          VERSUS                                  
                          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA   AND ANOTHER                  
                                            …..                                   
                           Advocate for the applicants : Mr. Tapan K. Sant        
                           APP for respondent/State : Mrs.M.S. Ghanekar           
                                             …..                                  
                                        CORAM  : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.               
                                                (VACATION  COURT)                 
                                       DATED  : 24th DECEMBER, 2024.              
                  PER COURT  :-                                                   
                  1.      Both these anticipatory bail applications arise out of offence
                  registered with Amalner Police Station, Dist. Jalgaon on 18.02.2024
                  vide F.I.R. No.61/2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 307,
                  323, 143, 147, 148, 109, 504, 506, 336 and 149 of the Indian Penal
                  Code.                                                           
                  2.        At the outset, I would like to quote the order dated  
                  19.12.2024, which reads as under :-                             
                          “1.     Learned APP seeks  time as papers are not       
                          received.                                               

                                               2                                  
                                                                   2031.2024ABA+.odt
                          2.      Stand over to 21.01.2025.                       
                          3.      Liberty to move before Vacation Court.”         
                  3.        Initially, this Court was not inclined to take these matters
                  during vacation, however, learned counsel for the applicants made a
                  statement that when matters were listed on 19.12.2024, it could not be
                  heard only because the police papers were not available with the
                  learned APP. He submits that it is only this the liberty to mention the
                  matters before Vacation Court is granted. The learned APP has   
                  confirms the statement in all fairness. It is in this backdrop that the
                  matters are taken up for hearing with the consent of the parties.
                  4.      The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the 
                  essential ingredients of Section 307 which is main section under which
                  the applicants are charged are not attracted. He draws my attention to
                  the injury certificates at pages 97 and 106 in the charge-sheet. Perusal
                  of the injury certificate at page 106 demonstrates that he has suffered
                  blunt trauma on the occipital region of head, contused lacerated
                  wounds over parietal region of head, blunt trauma over back, swelling
                  and pain over right leg and blunt trauma below left eye and cause of
                  injury is stated to be assault with hard blunt object. In view of the injury
                  certificate, he submits that the offence under Section 307 of the IPC
                  itself is not made out. He further submits that the charge-sheet is

                                               3                                  
                                                                   2031.2024ABA+.odt
                  already filed in the matter and the custody of the applicants is not
                  required in as much as investigation is over.                   
                  5.        The  learned APP   has  strenuously opposed the       
                  applications. She submits that the contents of the FIR clearly reveal
                  that an iron rod was used for assaulting the informant by Bhushan, the
                  applicant in ABA No.2031/2024 and Mayur, the applicant in ABA   
                  No.2033/2024 has used a fighter in order to inflict serious injuries on
                  the body of the informant. Referring to the injury certificate, she would
                  submit that multiple injuries have been suffered by the informant,
                  particularly on the head which could, in a given case, prove fatal. She
                  submits that the offence is serious in nature and as such applications
                  should be rejected.                                             
                  6.        I have perused the papers including the contents of the
                  FIR and injury certificates and other documents with able assistance of
                  the learned counsels.                                           
                  7.        Although, it is alleged that the injury on the parietal region
                  of the head is caused by iron rod, medical certificates would suggest
                  that it is likely to be caused by wooden stick. No particular injury has
                  been co-related by any medical certificate to the weapon, “fighter”.

                                               4                                  
                                                                   2031.2024ABA+.odt
                  8.        It is undisputed that nature of injuries is mentioned as
                  simple. The incident has occurred way back in February, 2024. The
                  learned counsel for the applicants makes a statement that both the
                  applicants do not have any criminal antecedents. The learned APP is
                  not in a position to dispute the same. Having regard to the totality of
                  the circumstances and most importantly the nature of injuries, I am
                  inclined to allow the applications. Hence, the following order :-
                                           ORDER                                  
                  (i)     The applications are allowed.                           
                  (ii)    In the event of arrest of the applicants in connection with
                  offence registered with Amalner Police Station, Dist. Jalgaon on
                  18.02.2024 vide F.I.R. No.61/2024 for the offence punishable under
                  Sections 307, 323, 143, 147, 148, 109, 504, 506, 336 and 149 of the
                  Indian Penal Code, they be released on anticipatory bail on executing
                  personal bond of Rs.25,000/- each along with one surety in the like
                  amount by each of them. The applicants shall attend the concerned
                  police station as and when required and shall co-operate in the 
                  investigation.                                                  
                                                     (ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.)         
                  sga/