Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2026 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Bombay High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. August

Nagnath Tulashiram Waghmare vs. the State of Maharashtra

Decided on 30 August 2024• Citation: BA/1317/2024• Bombay High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


    2024:BHC-AUG:19968                                                            
                                              1                942-BA-1317-24.odt 
                         IN THE HIGH COURT  OF JUDICATURE  AT BOMBAY              
                                    BENCH  AT AURANGABAD                          
                                BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1317 OF 2024                 
                                NAGNATH  TULASHIRAM WAGHMARE                      
                                            VERSUS                                
                                   THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA                       
                                              ...                                 
                             Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sachin S. Panale        
                              APP for Respondent : Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar           
                                              ...                                 
                                                CORAM   : S. G. MEHARE, J.        
                                                DATE    : 30-08-2024              
                   PER COURT  :-                                                  
                   1.    After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and the
                   learned APP for the respondent, the Court expressed disinclination
                   to grant bail. Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions,
                   seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted.        
                   2.   The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.            
                                                    ( S. G. MEHARE )              
                                                         JUDGE                    
                   rrd