Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Allahabad High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. November

Ramesh Kumar Pandey vs. State of U.p. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Decided on 29 November 2024• Citation: /10787/2024• Allahabad High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                                   Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:79240
            Court No. - 12                                                        
            Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10787 of 2024                       
            Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Pandey                                      
            Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another
            Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Pandey                              
            Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.                                    
            Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.                                            
            Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the
            record.                                                               
            The present application has been filed for the following main relief:-
                "(i) quash the impugned order dated 24/09/2024 passed by Learned ACJM I, Ayodhya in Case
                Crime No. 526/2023, Under Section 279, 304A, 427 of I.P.C., (Now-281, 106, 324(4) BNS) Police
                Station- Poorakalander, District- Ayodhya, by means of which proclamation under section 82 of
                Cr.P.C. has been Issued against the petitioner on printed proforma without application of judicial
                mind, contained as Annexure No. 1, to this petition.              
                ii. quash the entire criminal proceeding of Case Crime No.- 526/2023, Under Section 279, 304A,
                427 of 1.P.C. (Now-281, 106, 324(4) BNS), Police Station- Poorakalander, District Ayodhya,
                instituted by opposite party no. 2, contained as Annexure No. 2, to this petition.
                iii. stay the further proceeding of Case Crime No. 526/2023, Under Section 279, 304A, 427 of
                LP.C. (Now-281, 106, 324(4) BNS), Police Station- Poorakalander, District Ayodhya, pending
                before Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Ayodhya and operation of the impugned order dated
                24/09/2024, passed by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate- I, Ayodhya, contained as Annexure No. 1,
                to this petition."                                                
            After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may
            be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in
            view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil
            versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10
            SCC 51 as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be
            decided expeditiously.                                                
            Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.
            Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed
            for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court
            concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance
            with law.                                                             
            Liberty is also granted to the applicant to move discharge application before the court below
            and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.   
            Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra
            Kumar Antil (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it
            is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till
            the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action
            against the applicant in the aforesaid case.                          
            With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of.
            Order Date :- 29.11.2024                                              
            Jyoti/-                                                               
    Digitally signed by :-                                                        
    JYOTI RAJWANI                                                                 
    High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,                                        
    Lucknow Bench