Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Allahabad High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. June

Pushpa Devi and Another vs. State of U.p. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Decided on 28 June 2024• Citation: /4488/2024• Allahabad High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                         Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:44459-DB
            Court No. - 1                                                         
            Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4488 of 2024               
            Petitioner :- Pushpa Devi And Another                                 
            Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others    
            Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Raman Mishra                         
            Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.                                        
            Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.                                       
            Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.                                    
            1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioners is
            taken on record.                                                      
            2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the
            State.                                                                
            3. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-          
                (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding
                the opposite party no. 3 not to harass and disturb the peaceful marriage life
                and liberty of the petitioners.                                   
                (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding
                the opposite parties no. 2 to restrain the opposite party no. 3 not to harass
                and disturb peaceful life and liberty of the petitioners.         
            4. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are
            major and they have married out of their own free will as per Hindu rites
            and rituals on 24.5.2024 at Arya Samaj Mandir, Lucknow. In support of 
            his contention, learned counsel has annexed family register of petitioner
            no. 1 contained as annexure SA-1 to the writ petition. As per family  
            register, the petitioner no. 1 is major and she has categorically stated that
            she has married with the petitioner no. 2 out of her free will and wants
            to lead her life with him as his wife.                                
            5. Both the petitioners are present in person before this Court and from
            appearance they appear to be major.                                   
            6. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions has stated that there is no
            complaint or F.I.R. lodged against the petitioners and they are not being
            harassed by the local police concerned.                               

            7. It has been alleged that petitioners have entered into matrimonial 
            relationship being above the age of majority. The grievance of the    
            petitioners in the writ petition is that personal liberty of the petitioners is
            unduly interfered with by the police authorities without there being any
            complaint or F.I.R. lodged against them. The position in law as laid down
            by Apex Court in paragraph 17 of the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.
            and another, 2006 (5) SCC 475 reads as under:-                        
                "17..... We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities
                throughout the country will see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major
                undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a women or man
                who is a major, the couple is not harassed by anyone nor subjected to
                threats or acts of violence, and anyone who gives such threats or harasses
                or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to
                task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons
                and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law."
            8. In the case of the petitioners there is no F.I.R. lodged. The police
            cannot be presumed to harass the petitioners only under the influence of
            the private respondent No.5. The action of Police is governed by the  
            provision of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Particularly, Chapter XII
            of the Code makes provision for information to Police and their power to
            investigate. In absence of any proof of such information regarding which
            the provision has been made under Section 154 and 155 of the Cr.P.C., it
            will not be justified to grant a blanket protection to the petitioners as
            prayed.                                                               
            9. The  petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the   
            petitioners that in case they are being threatened by their family    
            members, they may file an application under Section 154(2) or 154(3) of
            the Cr.P.C. before the police station/Superintendent of Police concerned or
            move  an application under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. before the   
            Magistrate concerned or file a complaint case under Section 200 of the
            Cr.P.C. before the authorities concerned.                             
            .                                                                     
                                 [Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.]
            Order Date :- 28.6.2024                                               
            kanhaiya                                                              
    Digitally signed by :-                                                        
    KANHAIYA KUMAR                                                                
    High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,                                        
    Lucknow Bench