Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Allahabad High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. July

Sulfan vs. State of U.p. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Decided on 31 July 2024• Citation: /6732/2024• Allahabad High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                          Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:52129
                             Court No. - 13                                       
                             Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6732 of 2024       
                             Applicant :- Sulfan                                  
                             Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko
                             And 3 Others                                         
                             Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Kumar Singh,Umesh   
                             Chaturvedi                                           
                             Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.                   
                             Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.                           
                             Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for
                             the State as well as perused the record.             
                             The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with
                             Section 528 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (in short
                             "BNSS") has been filed by the applicant for the following main
                             relief:-                                             
                             "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may
                             graciously be pleased to quash the summoning order dated 07.11.2023
                             passed by the Additional Session Judge/Special Judge POCSO Act,
                             Shrawasti by means of which he has taken cognizance and summons to the
                             petitioner upon Charge Sheet No.A-195/2023 dated 13.10.2023 arising
                             out from the Case FIR/Case Crime No.205/2023, Under section 452,354,
                             I.P.C. & section 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Hardattnagar Girant,
                             District Shrawasti in Special S.T. No. 424/2023, "State versus Sulfan" in
                             the interest of justice."                            
                             After arguing, at some length, learned counsel for the applicant
                             has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file
                             bail application before the trial court which may be decided in
                             view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
                             Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
                             and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No. 5191 of 2021
                             as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below
                             and the same may be decided expeditiously.           
                             Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned
                             counsel for the applicant.                           
                             Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application U/s 482
                             Cr.P.C. is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a
                             direction to the court below that if the applicant apply for bail
                             before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be
                             considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

                             Liberty is also granted to the applicant to move discharge
                             application before the court below and the same shall be
                             decided expeditiously in accordance with law.        
                             Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation
                             made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra), this Court
                             is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is
                             expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of
                             30 days from today or till the applicant apply for bail,
                             whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action
                             against the applicant in the aforesaid case.         
                             With the aforesaid observations, the present application is
                             disposed of.                                         
                             Order Date :- 31.7.2024                              
                             Vinay/-                                              
    Digitally signed by :-                                                        
    VINAY KUMAR                                                                   
    High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,                                        
    Lucknow Bench