Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Allahabad High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. August

Jangali @ Om Prakash vs. State of U.p. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Decided on 31 August 2024• Citation: /3327/2024• Allahabad High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                          Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:59817
                             Court No. - 14                                       
                             Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3327   
                             of 2024                                              
                             Applicant :- Jangali @ Om Prakash                    
                             Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
                             Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Shankar Verma,Aman Kumar
                             Dhanuk,Deshraj Singh,Indra Mani Pandey,Kaushal Kishore
                             Tewari,Ravindra Singh,Shakti                         
                             Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.                   
                             Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.                      
                             Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for
                             the State as well as perused the record.             
                             The present bail application has been filed by accused-applicant
                             seeking bail in Case Crime No.08 of 2020, under Section 307
                             I.P.C., P.S. Sadarpur, District Sitapur.             
                             In the prosecution case it is alleged that on 06.01.2020 at about
                             12:00 am in the night, the accused Jangali and Munna along
                             with other co-accused persons came inside the room of the
                                                    balli                         
                             informant with the help of a and took the informant from
                             home and dragged till 200 meters with intent to kill him, they
                             fired upon him. The bullet came on the right hand of the
                             informant. After the informant cried and villagers started
                             coming the accused ran away. It is also alleged that the cash and
                             jewellery kept in the almirah have also been stolen. 
                             Learned counsel for applicant submits that injured has changed
                             the version of the F.I.R. While giving statement under Section
                             161 Cr.P.c. he has not made any allegation of robbery or theft.
                             He submits that till date charges have not been framed. He also
                             submits that perusal of the record shows that injured has
                             received a lacerated wound of 3.5 X 3 cm bone deep on his
                             right arm. It is a single injury.                    

                             Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that offence
                             will not travel beyond Section 325 IPC. The ingredients to
                             attract Section 307 IPC is missing. He submits that the
                             applicant is in jail since 26.02.2024.               
                             Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer.          
                             On due consideration to the submissions advanced, perusal of
                             the record as also the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail
                             since 26.02.2024, nature of the injury and the improvement
                             made by the complainant/injured in his statement under Section
                             161 Cr.P.C. so also the judgment passed by Supreme Court in
                             Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh vs. State of Maharashtra and 
                             another : Criminal Appeal No.2787 of 2024, without   
                             expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit
                             case for enlarging the applicant on bail.            
                             Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.        
                             Let the applicant Jangali @ Om Prakash be released on bail in
                             aforesaid case crime number subject to his furnishing a personal
                             bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the
                             satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following
                             conditions:                                          
                             (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the
                             trial.                                               
                             (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution
                             witness.                                             
                             (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any
                             inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
                             facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
                             facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the
                             evidence.                                            
                             (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he

                             shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence
                             when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of
                             this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as
                             abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
                             (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on
                             each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case
                             of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may
                             proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal
                             Code.                                                
                             (vi) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial
                             and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section
                             82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the
                             court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial
                             court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with
                             law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.   
                             Order Date :- 31.8.2024                              
                             Saurabh Yadav/-                                      
    Digitally signed by :-                                                        
    SAURABH YADAV                                                                 
    High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,                                        
    Lucknow Bench