Skip to content
Order
  • Library
  • Features
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Get started
Book a Demo

Order

At Order.law, we’re building India’s leading AI-powered legal research platform.Designed for solo lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams, Order helps you find relevant case law, analyze judgments, and draft with confidence faster and smarter.

Product

  • Features
  • Blog

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

Library

  • Acts
  • Judgments
© 2025 Order. All rights reserved.
  1. Home/
  2. Library/
  3. Allahabad High Court/
  4. 2024/
  5. April

Atiulla and Another vs. State of U.p Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Decided on 30 April 2024• Citation: /4639/2024• Allahabad High Court
Download PDF

Read Judgment


                                          Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:33669
                             Court No. - 14                                       
                             Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4639   
                             of 2024                                              
                             Applicant :- Atiulla And Another                     
                             Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
                             Counsel for Applicant :- Dharm Trivedi               
                             Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.                   
                             Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.                            
                             Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for
                             the State-respondent.                                
                             The submission of the learned counsel for the applicants is that
                             the applicants have been falsely implicated in Case Crime
                             No.108 of 2024, under Sections2(b)(i)/3 U.P. Gangster Act,
                             Police Station Paliya, District Kheri.               
                             The submission of the learned counsel for the applicants is that
                             only one case has been shown against the applicant in the gang-
                             chart with regard to Case Crime No. 673 of 2022, under
                             Sections 364, 302, 201 IPC, Police Station Palia, District Kheri.
                             It is urged that in the aforesaid case, the applicants had applied
                             for bail bearing Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 6009 of
                             2023 and 7566 of 2023 and a Coordinate Bench of this Court by
                             means of the orders dated 7.8.2023 and 11.8.2023 enlarged the
                             applicants on bail and a copy of the said bail orders has also
                             been placed on record as Annexure no.2. It is also submitted
                             that on the basis of the said case shown in the gang chart, the
                             applicants have been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is
                             also urged that similarly situate co-accused Waris Ali has
                             already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated
                             27.4.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4461
                             of 2024. Moreover, the applicants are not a member of any gang
                             or gang leader. They are languishing in jail since 24.3.2024.
                             Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail, however, could
                             not dispute the aforesaid facts.                     
                             Considering the rival submissions, the facts and circumstances
                             of the case and the material available on record as well as
                             considering the nature of allegations and accusation against the
                             applicants, the severity of the punishment if convicted and the
                             period of incarceration as well as the fact that no apprehension

                             has been expressed by the learned AGA that the applicants are
                             at the risk of fleeing justice or that he would tamper with
                             evidence or influence any witness, hence, at this stage, without
                             expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is
                             of the view that the applicants are entitled to be released on
                             bail.                                                
                             Let the applicants- Atiulla and Shakib Khan involved in Case
                             Crime No. 108 of 2024, under Sections 2(b)(i)/3 U.P. Gangster
                             Act, Police Station Paliya, District Kheri be released on bail on
                             their furnishing a personal bond with two reliable sureties each
                             in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
                             At the time of executing required sureties the following
                             conditions shall be imposed in the interest of justice:-
                             (i) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that he
                             shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence
                             when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of
                             this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as
                             abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
                             (ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on
                             each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case
                             of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may
                             proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal
                             Code.                                                
                             (iii) In case, the applicants misuse the liberty of bail during trial
                             and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section
                             82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the
                             court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial
                             court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with
                             law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.   
                             (iv) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the
                             trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii)
                             framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section
                             313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court, absence of the
                             applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall
                             be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of
                             liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
                             (v) The applicants shall neither influence any witness nor
                             tamper with any evidence after their release.        
                             Order Date :- 30.4.2024                              
                             Shravan                                              
    Digitally signed by :-                                                        
    SHRAVAN KUMAR                                                                 
    High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,                                        
    Lucknow Bench